WHY ARE PEOPLE CHANGING AND UNDOING THINGS THAT DO NOT BELONG TO THEM? THAT´S NONEDUCATIONAL, LACK OF RESPECT POR THE WORK OF OTHERS, AND LACK OF ETHICS?

January 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. WP:UNDUE and WP:OR are the start. You are editorializing on the importance/value of this item and making unsubstantiated claims about its novelty (those are wikipedia content problems). You are edit-warring, asserting ownership over article content, and assuming ill motives of others (those are wikipedia editor-behavior problems) after it is clear several other editors dispute your addition. DMacks (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Metrication in the United States with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —UY Scuti Talk 10:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Metrication in the United States. —UY Scuti Talk 10:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note that sock-puppetry (via alternate account User:PingaPaTi‎, for example) is a forbidden behavior on Wikipedia. I've gone ahead and blocked that account too, and am leaving this note so others will be aware. DMacks (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply