Mgottesfeld

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 13:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are adding NPOV material, essentially a smear campaign against the subject of the article. KonveyorBelt 23:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

You edited first. You are the one engaged in an edit war, not me. I'm preserving cited information.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mgottesfeld reported by User:Konveyor Belt (Result: ). Thank you. KonveyorBelt 23:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest with Logan River Academy‎

I saw from this post that you've identified yourself as Marty Gottesfeld, a community organizer and advocate seeking to shut down Logan River Academy. Firstly, I'd like to thank you for your disclosure, as the declaration of your connection to interests outside of Wikipedia is a form of transparency that helps your fellow editors to know what your point of view and intentions are with your edits. Unfortunately, this also shows that you may have difficulty remaining unbiased when editing any topics related to the academy. I know that some of your edits to the article have been challenged in the past, and while we have no policy preventing editors from participating at articles where they have a conflict of interest, any disruption that comes about from editing in those areas may lead to sanctions (such as bans restricting you from areas of the project or particular activities, or blocks preventing you from editing Wikipedia at all).

Therefore, I urge caution in any future participation either at Logan River Academy's article, or any other article where Logan River Academy is mentioned or otherwise involved. To avoid problems, such participation should be non-controversial in nature, such as reverting obvious vandalism, correcting typos, fixing links, or anything else listed here. You are not restricted from participating at the article's discussion page, on the contrary you are encouraged to participate in discussions there. If you have not done so yet, I suggest reading the plain and simple COI guide which is a well-written document designed to help any editors participating at Wikipedia with conflicts of interest, and designed specifically to help a person in your situation without all of the jargon and arcane terminology commonly found in most policies and guidelines. You can also ask for assistance at the conflict of interest noticeboard if you run into problems with other editors who object to any of your actions due to your COI. You can also ask me for assistance, I have worked with editors who have conflicts of interest for years now, helping them edit Wikipedia while avoiding disputes and other problems.

Having said all that, I don't see any problems with your recent edits for the most part. Some of your edits to the Logan River article were probably skewed a bit negatively, but your response to others who criticized you for those edits has been pretty positive. I see here where you agreed to try to find better sources to back up claims you had made in the article. I see here where you asked another editor to help you bring a more neutral tone to the article. So I truly am here to try to help you avoid future conflicts if I can and otherwise provide help, I'm not just trying to warn you or otherwise come down on you. My only specific caution is to try not to specifically bring up your Twitter or the advocacy web site address in your discussions, as that can be seen as promoting your cause on Wikipedia (which isn't allowed). Please let me know if you need any help, thank you. -- Atama頭 21:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Logan River Academy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• "]'', US FTC - Consumer Information - Residential Treatment Programs for Teens - Item 3]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Logan River Academy

I'm leaving this same message for Bookkeeper123456. It looks like the two of you are involved in an edit war at this article. Please stop and discuss your point of view on the article's talk page. Anyone who continues to revert can be blocked. It is clear that you both disagree, but discussion should not and cannot be done in edit summaries. Other editors are watching that article because of the persistent disruption and continual disputes and so they may give opinions or act to moderate the dispute (I myself will be watching the dispute to be sure that it's constructive). -- Atama頭 16:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)