Mickeys1fan
Welcome to Wikipedia!
edit
|
Reverted your revision [1] to MacBook_Pro
editI undid your edit because it doesn't follow WP:SPECULATION. ~NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 13:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- You mean, NSD, it does fall into the policy of WP:SPECULATION :) Airplaneman ✈ 21:46, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
While it is a nice picture, putting it into the infobox doesn't seem to look good, or appropriate. The picture can be inserted elsewhere in the article, and it would be appreciated if you can source a updated logo for the infobox instead. Sb617 (Talk) 13:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Adding flags to infoboxes
editPlease read WP:INFOBOXFLAG. Adding flags to infoboxes for articles on aircraft accidents seems entirely unnecessary, and contrary to the manual of style. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
editYour recent editing history at Air France Flight 447 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:44, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at South African Airways Flight 295 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Air France Flight 358 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Canadian International Airways Logo English.tiff listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Canadian International Airways Logo English.tiff, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Virgin Atlantic to Vancouver
editRegarding your recent edit to Virgin Atlantic destinations, Virgin Atlantic stopped flying to Vancouver International Airport on October 11th, and the service will not resume next summer. See sources: [2][3][4] Please do not add it to Virgin's destination list. Thank you. HuffTheWeevil / talk / contribs 05:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 15
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balance of power (Parliament), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Conservative Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Mickeys1fan/sandbox
editUser:Mickeys1fan/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mickeys1fan/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mickeys1fan/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)