Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit
W e l c o m e
 
Cookies to welcome you! 
Hello, Mickeys1fan! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Airplaneman and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia!

You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. You'll soon learn to appreciate people using helpful edit summaries, so please contribute by filling in that box (just above Save Page) every time you edit.

If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. (There's a comprehensive Directory of WikiProjects, and you'll find many article talk pages have banners from a relevant project.) Again, welcome, and happy editing! Airplaneman 19:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Some useful links to learn more about Wikipedia:
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Reverted your revision [1] to MacBook_Pro

edit

I undid your edit because it doesn't follow WP:SPECULATION. ~NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ messagechanges) 13:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

You mean, NSD, it does fall into the policy of WP:SPECULATION :) Airplaneman 21:46, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reverted this edit to American Eagle.

edit

While it is a nice picture, putting it into the infobox doesn't seem to look good, or appropriate. The picture can be inserted elsewhere in the article, and it would be appreciated if you can source a updated logo for the infobox instead. Sb617 (Talk) 13:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Adding flags to infoboxes

edit

Please read WP:INFOBOXFLAG. Adding flags to infoboxes for articles on aircraft accidents seems entirely unnecessary, and contrary to the manual of style. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Air France Flight 447 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:44, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at South African Airways Flight 295 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Air France Flight 358 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Canadian International Airways Logo English.tiff listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Canadian International Airways Logo English.tiff, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Virgin Atlantic to Vancouver

edit

Regarding your recent edit to Virgin Atlantic destinations, Virgin Atlantic stopped flying to Vancouver International Airport on October 11th, and the service will not resume next summer. See sources: [2][3][4] Please do not add it to Virgin's destination list. Thank you. HuffTheWeevil / talk / contribs 05:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balance of power (Parliament), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Conservative Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Mickeys1fan/sandbox

edit

  User:Mickeys1fan/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mickeys1fan/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mickeys1fan/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply