Mictesting123

{{helpme}} Welcome!

Hello, Mictesting123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Amender technologies, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Glenfarclas  (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amender technologies

A tag has been placed on Amender technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Amender technologies, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Help request

Algebraist 14:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Please mail me the copy

Re your message: Per your request, I have restored the article to your user space at User:Mictesting123/Amender technologies. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: If you can establish the company's notability per the relevant guidelines, then you can move the article back into main space. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: You will need to citations to references from third-party, reliable sources to establish the company's notability. For example, if the company was profiled by an online news source, newspaper, or trade magazine then they can be used to establish the company's notability. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Mictesting123/Amender technologies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: User:Mictesting123/Amender technologies was moved to Amender technologies by Mictesting123 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-01-27T16:10:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

User:AmenderTechnologies

I see that you or somebody associated with you decided to create another account with the name AmenderTechnologies. Such account names are not allowed per the Wikipedia user name policy. Please stick to one account. Please read the Business' FAQ before you proceed with your article. Unfortunately, your company does not appear to meet the notability guidelines at this time. Perhaps in the future it will and the you can restart the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: I'm sorry, but I will not unblock AmenderTechnologies account or restore the user page as they are clear violations of the Wikipedia user name policy and blatant advertising for your company. You may request a second opinion by another administrator by logging into the AmenderTechnologies account and requesting an unblock per the instructions left on that account's talk page. I strongly suggest that you carefully read the Business' FAQ for what you should and should not do on Wikipedia regarding your company. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: I will not unblock the AmenderTechnologies account because the use of that account would violate the user name policy as I stated before. You can not trade one account's block for another. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: There is nothing for me to restore as the user page is nearly identical to the copy that I restored for you back in January. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Also, when replying to me, it is not necessary to create an entirely new section each time on my talk page. Instead, you can add additional messages to me in the same section just like how I have done on your talk page. The use of sections helps keep conversations together. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: All revisions of the article are available to you by checking the history of the article at [1]. You can view any of the revisions by clicking on the date of the revision you want to look at. See Help:Page history for additional details. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amender technologies

A tag has been placed on Amender technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Polargeo (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amender Technologies

A tag has been placed on Amender Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)