User talk:Midnightblueowl/Archive 11

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

TFA

edit
images 2021
 

Thank you today for Porlock Stone Circle, "about one of two surviving stone circles dating from the late Neolithic or early Bronze Age that are located in Exmoor, southwestern England"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

... and today for Rastafari, "about one of the world's best-known, if often misunderstood, religious movements"! - You are amazing, have a good new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wanted to pop by and say thank you for today's TFA. Such an important topic! Sincerely, Ovinus (talk) 09:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

... and today Jerome Kohl, remembered in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

FAC: Love for Sale (Bilal album)

edit

Hi. Could you spare some time and review my nomination of this article? Thanks. isento (talk) 10:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Martin Rundkvist

edit

Hey there Midnightblueowl, hope you're doing well. Chiswick Chap and I have been working on this article (currently at User:Usernameunique/Martin Rundkvist), and given your work on articles about other archaeologists, I wonder if you might be interested in giving it a quick read? We're planning on bringing it to mainspace with a concurrent good-article nomination, but given that it's been on the losing end of trial-by-AfD twice already, having your eyes on it would help to ensure it's in the best possible shape this time. Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 02:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Usernameunique: Thanks for your message, and for your work on the article on Runkvist - it's looking in petty good shape. There are a few minor prose issues I'd comment on ("rich finds to the West" for instance should probably be "rich finds to the west"; "doubling as his dissertation" should perhaps be more precise, i.e. "PhD dissertation" or whatever it may be) but other than that I'd say it looks good to go. I think you've got enough non-primary sources to avoid a future deletion, which is not always the easiest task when writing about living academics. All the best! Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for giving it a read! I've adopted your two suggestions. Yes, fingers crossed for take three; as you say, finding sources for living academics is not always easy. --Usernameunique (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Candomblé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jurema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requesting article expansion support

edit

Greetings,

Requesting you to visit articles Islamic advice literature and Draft:Aurats (word) and help expand the articles if topics interest you.

The request is being made to you since you seem to have made some Iran related edits.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requesting edit examination and opinion

edit

Greetings,

Please do visit Talk:Cynthia D. Ritchie#Slander of Benazir Bhutto to examine discussed edits, if you find topic interested requesting your opinion, there.

For neutrality purpose opinion request is being made to users who significantly edited different sides of Pakistani political spectrum articles.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

TFA

edit
 
Hellebore

Thank you today for Evelyn Mase, the "fairly short article is about Nelson Mandela's first wife"! You deserve February flowers ;) - Perhaps you can take a look at (the somewhat similar) Doris Stockhausen. I wonder if we should include - and if yes how - the interview by a school girl mentioned in the press. I hope she's still alive, - she was in 2013, pictured in the source. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's great to see this fine article as TFA Nick-D (talk) 23:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit

Hi. Can File:WABC's Bob Grant.jpg be used on the WABC page? Thanks. --2603:7000:2143:8500:16E:3F22:415B:58AB (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Early life of Fidel Castro

edit

Hi, Midnightblueowl! I'm translating your Early life of Fidel Castro article to Portuguese and Spanish, which might I say, is phenomenal. However, I encountered an ambiguous phrase, and since you were the one who created this article I'm opening a new section here on your talk page.

Although Ángel's business ventures prospered, he ensured that Fidel grew up alongside the children of the farm's workforce, many of whom were Haitian economic migrants of African descent

By this, you meant that Fidel grew up alongside the children who worked on the farm, or the children of the (adult) workforce? Thanks! BunnyyHop (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@BunnyyHop: Thanks for your message; in this context it means the children of the adult workforce, I believe. Midnightblueowl (talk) 09:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Alright, thanks for your response! :) --BunnyyHop (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

New image proposal for Fidel Castro

edit

Hey Midnightblueowl! :) I'm HandIsNotNookls, and I was the original editor who placed this edit on the Fidel Castro article. I just wanted to invite you to take place in this talk page discussion I've started to possibly establish a consensus for changing or keeping the page's infobox. Feel free to give your opinion!

Cheers. Have a great day. :) -HandIsNotNookls (talk) 00:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mari Lwyd

edit

[1] Clipping I saw and thought might be of interest. The paper is the Monmouthshire Beacon. KJP1 (talk) 07:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

How interesting. Many thanks, KJP1. Midnightblueowl (talk) 08:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Removal of Theosophy template at Helena Blavatsky

edit

Here you removed the Theosophy template in the article of a major figure in theosophy because it was "messy". Please explain. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I usually don't template regulars, but since you can't be bothered to explain your edit, here's your warning:

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Helena Blavatsky, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Apologies, I have not been on Wikipedia much over the past week or so. With this edit I was mostly concerned by the mass addition of images to that right hand side; the template was part of those recent additions that I thought unnecessary, but I take less issue with its inclusion. Midnightblueowl (talk) 09:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your response. I hope "I take less issue" means you take no issue with the template. If that's not the case, what is wrong with inclusion of the theosophy template in the article of a major figure in theosophy? I certainly understand if you removed it carelessly; that can happen to any of us, including myself. But I hope the removal wasn't intentional. Sundayclose (talk) 15:55, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Like a lot of editors, I think sidebars are detrimental to Wikipedia, but this particular one isn't causing too many problems to the flow and structure of the article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 08:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I respect your right to your opinion, but you don't have the authority to make such a unilateral decision without discussion. You were wrong, but thanks for your comments here. Have a good day. Sundayclose (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Allan Bennet Revert

edit

Good Day Midnightblueowl discussion on talk page has updated again, see the first section updated post here again NirodhaDhamma (talk) 01:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

National Front

edit

I had a read of your Nation Front article article recently, and just wanted to say well done on such an excellent piece of writing. Cheers - SchroCat 109.249.185.75 (talk) 12:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Caustic3

edit

Hey there, the Boris Yeltin article has come under constant revision by user Caustic3. I reverted what I believed to be edits by that user that made the article take a vindictive tone against Yeltsin and portrayed him as a cartoon villain. I made two edits from the IP 146.115.73.211. The first was an undo of a section Caustic3 definitely added in. The second was an undo of a paragraph I very much suspect was written by that user. Feel free to check my edits as there is a chance some good information got caught up in there. I think that Caustic3 should not be allowed to edit that page anymore, however that works. I do not have a positive view of Yeltsin myself, but it is jarring to see any article on wikipedia that has a vindictive, negative tone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.73.211 (talk) 01:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

edit
Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
 
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
  • This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

A question of an article

edit

Hi, Midnightblueowl -- big fan of the good work. I've recently massively overhauled the article Prehistoric religion, which is rather in your wheelhouse, and have brought it to GA. I'm now in the long slog of improving the article between GA and a potential future FAC, which will take some time itself, and I'd be happy if you could look at the article and share your thoughts on it. Vaticidalprophet 07:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your message, Vaticidalprophet. Will try and take a look in a bit. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Santería scheduled for TFA

edit

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 25 August, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page if one has been posted. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Promotion of Santería

edit
Congratulations, Midnightblueowl! The article you nominated, Santería, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
August songs
 

Thank you today for the article, "about a religion that formed in Cuba, drawing upon both traditional West African religions (primarily those of the Yoruba) with elements of Roman Catholicism. It has since spread to various parts of the Americas and also to Europe."! - Sharing the Main page with a little devotional song, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Napoleon GAR

edit

Napoleon, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Lennart97 (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merger discussion for Indigenous religion

edit

  An article that you have been involved in editing—Indigenous religion—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. —Caorongjin 💬 08:04, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for You

edit
  The Pelican in Her Piety Barnstar
The Pelican in Her Piety Barnstar is given to recognize editors who have improved the coverage of Louisiana on Wikipedia.
For your clean-up work on Louisiana Voodoo. Thank you! Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 13:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Palo religion

edit

Hello,

Bakongo people are not in Cameroon and Mozambique. Somebody040404 (talk) 10:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Io, Saturnalia!

edit
  Io, Saturnalia!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scientology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elmira.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

edit
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
 
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
  • On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).Reply