The article HearMe has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 20:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Joel Smernoff

edit

Hi. You marked Joel Smernoff's page as unsourced or poorly sourced contropversial claims. I am wondering what specifically was either.

Thanks, mb —Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeBush79 (talkcontribs) 21:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wasn't me. That tag was placed December 11, 2007 by RHaworth. Afasmit (talk) 21:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nor me - I've never edited that page. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Socialcasting

edit
 

The article Socialcasting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Found zero hits on Bing news.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sean Brunnock (talk) 01:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply