MikkyGay
|
Michael Koppel
edit
The article Michael Koppel has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:57, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Yiannis Georgiou
editPlease do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Lol Yiannis is gay! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Mikkyk
edit Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Mikkyk, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Mikkyk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Mikkyk, you will be blocked from editing. Veinor (talk to me) 16:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
The guy is a developer for Bungie. I know him through my mates mates. Why do you say i do not give a reason when i do?
- You need to provide independent sources about him to establish his notability. Wikipedia doesn't allow people to create articles about whatever they want; there are standards as to what people can and cannot create articles on. For people, the relevant one is Wikipedia:Notability (people). And one of the main requirements is that there are sources about the person that are created by people or groups independent of the person. Veinor (talk to me) 16:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
OK, i'm sorry. I will make appropriate contributions from now on.
Warwickshire lalala. On 26 April 2008, the fourth day out of four was to be played between Northamptonshire CCC and Warwickshire CCC in The LV County Championship. Warwickshire CCC won an incredible match by two wickets after scoring a dreadful 1st innings score. They then went on to record one of the biggest 4th innings chase-downs wit their second innings as follows:
Ian Westwood 11 off 29 c Sales b Wigley
Darren Maddy 130 off 167 c Wakely b Panesar
Ian Bell 62 off 74 c Peters b Boje
Jonathan Trott 48 off 87 c Klusener b Panesar
Michael Powell 21 off 40 st Wessels b Boje
Tim Ambrose 19 off 33 b Panesar
Andre Botha 29 off 30 st Wessels b Panesar
Neil Carter 27 off 26 run out
Ian Salisbury 20 off 9 not out
Monde Zondeki 3 off 4 not out
Extras 4nb 6w 6b 2lb 18
Total for 8 388 (82.5 ovs)
Lucas 8.0 3 38 0
Klusener 16.0 2 85 0
Panesar 28.0 3 105 4
Wigley 4.0 0 33 1
Boje 26.5 1 119 2
Fall of wicket
44 Ian Westwood
153 Ian Bell
256 Darren Maddy
267 Jonathan Trott
301 Michael Powell
313 Tim Ambrose
361 Neil Carter
374 Andre Botha
April 2008
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sustainable development, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sustainable development was changed by MikkyGay (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-29T13:46:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Global warming constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC))
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Grand Theft Auto IV. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Jaysweet (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to King Edward VI Camp Hill.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Roleplayer (talk) 14:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yahhh bitch!, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Yahhh!. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Yahhh bitch!
edit Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Yahhh bitch!, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Why did my contribution get deleted. It is completely real. I have connections with his family, i live in the same area as his family and have been told this information by his family so why was it deleted?
My block for nothing
editThis block sucks. I haven't done anything since you gave me a warning and now i am blocked for vandalism. Vandalism of what. Can i ask or will i get a bigger block time? You have blocked me for nothing. If you show me what i ahve done i will accept the ban.
MikkyGay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i got blocked for nothing. i have done nothing since my warning
Decline reason:
You have made almost nothing in the way of positive contributions. You are consistently disruptive and I see no sign that that will change. I think you should look at a one week block as a gift. If I had been the one to block you, it would have been indefinite. — Trusilver 21:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You can't just keep vandalizing up to the point of a final warning, wait a day, and then repeat the process. When you started editing, you did nothing but vandalize, and you received a final warning for that. Then you created the "Yaaah bitch" page. That was blockable right there. --Jaysweet (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
That's not true. That is what i got a warning for and what i am saying is i got warned for that and then banned for that also despite the page being deleted (which i tired to do) and me then not editing anythinng after my warning.
I did not edit anything after my warning.
And looking at Trusilver's comments. I try to make positive contributions such as my Joleon Lescott contribution but it got deleted despite being the truth and me having first-hand experience!
Removing warnings
editIt's against wikipedia rules (see Wikipedia:Removing warnings) to remove warnings and block dispute tags; removing them, and sculpting this section to make it look like you were being ignored on your requests for feedback as to the reasoning for the block, is considered bad faith acts and vandalism (and likely would be a basis for further blocks.) Quaeler (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Adding non-talk related content
editI removed the several hundred kilobytes of 'your favorite pics' images that you had linked here. Not only is this type of content (like your score sheet content) not suitable for your Talk page (which is for a discussion about the user's actions), but it needlessly bulks and obscures the content that editors wanting to post content here must endure. The content, though, is ok for your User page if you would like. Please see Wikipedia:Talk_page - thanks. Quaeler (talk) 14:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
May 2009
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Manchester United F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)