Millenniumshakespeare

Image copyright problem with Image:Shake 004.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Shake 004.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 14:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Book reviews

If your books have been reviewed, please add citations for the book reviews to a new "References" section in the article. Without references, the article is likely to be deleted. -- Eastmain (talk) 18:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

when you start over

first of all pick another user name, that does not match the name of what it is you are writing about. Second, read our Business FAQ for a general guide to writing articles about things you are involved in, and then, our guide to writing Wikipedia articles. give factual information about the edition. cite some published reviews, not blurbs or web postings. and eliminate unnecessary adjectives. Good luck, but this present article is not a usable beginning. DGG (talk) 21:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Millennium Shakespeare

A tag has been placed on Millennium Shakespeare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Millennium Shakespeare and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 21:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Millennium Shakespeare, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here.

--Orange Mike | Talk 14:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Any one who can assist me would be appreciated Millenniumshakespeare (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Need help?

Have look at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. — Edokter • Talk • 00:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I wish this account to be deleted... I will begin a new account.. can some one help me please Millenniumshakespeare (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

If you want to abandon this account, you can request that this page be deleted, and basically just quit using it. Register for a new account, and use only that one from now on. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Millennium Shakespeare

An article that you have been involved in editing, Millennium Shakespeare, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millennium Shakespeare. Thank you. —teb728 t c 06:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Can some one add something to the article which has links to it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.215.177 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 20 February 2009

Perhaps you could add something to the article. Are you aware of something that could be added that would qualify it under WP:BK? —teb728 t c 21:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Stewart KL Cover 05-09-20.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Stewart KL Cover 05-09-20.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Stewart WT Cover 05-09-20 copy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Stewart WT Cover 05-09-20 copy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Stewart MWW Cover 05-09-20 (A) copy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Stewart MWW Cover 05-09-20 (A) copy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)