MintChocChip
Welcome
editHello MintChocChip, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you have enjoyed contributing and want to stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started:
- Learn the basics by reading the introduction and taking the tutorial.
- Remember to sign messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) to automatically insert your username and the date.
- Enjoy editing to improve articles, but try to leave an edit summary to explain what you are doing.
- Create your first article using the Article Wizard to help avoid common mistakes, which may lead to article deletion.
- Although you don't need to be familiar with all of Wikipedia's policies, try to keep to the core principles and basic guidelines.
- When dealing with fellow Wikipedians, please remain polite, solve problems calmly, and remember that no-one is out to get you.
- Get involved with the community by joining a WikiProject.
- Make any test edits in the sandbox or click here and create a sandbox of your own.
- If you are having difficulty, consider finding a mentor to give you more personal advice.
- If in doubt, be bold. If you make a mistake, it can easily be reverted.
If you need any more information, plenty of help is available - check out Wikipedia:Questions; ask your question here and attract help with the code {{helpme}}; or leave me a message on my talk page explaining your problem and I will help as best as I can. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 12:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
edit
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Greenock125 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:31, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I am very surprised to find that someone thinks that I am a Sock Puppet of Greenock125, I have never heard of this user. I am very new to Wikipedia and feel I am being targeted wrongly, I don't know what to do. MintChocChip (talk) 11:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- OK. I see you have already commented on the investigation page, so that's fine - you could comment more there, if you want. If innocent, I'm sure this will be resolved. If you are innocent and the SPI case decides you are not, then there are ways to appeal the decision, which will be explained at that time. Chzz ► 12:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank You for the help, I really hope this can be resolved. MintChocChip (talk) 12:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Unblock
edit
MintChocChip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have done nothing wrong here, I am new to Wikipedia. I will agree to any condition to get unblocked and to improve my editing. Please give me a chance.
Decline reason:
I'm not convinced that a) you're not a sock, and b) that you have even a passing understanding of the general notability guidelines. We also seem to have a bit of WP:OWN ... none of which add up to good things. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am so angry that all my some of my articles have been deleted, I worked so hard on them I feel that it was just a waste of time. MintChocChip (talk) 16:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I really want to be unlocked I will agree to any condition, I really want to be a be of Wikipedia I promise to be a constructive editor just give me a chance. MintChocChip (talk) 16:29, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I promise to listen to any advice in the future. MintChocChip (talk) 16:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I promise to read guidelines if I am unblocked. MintChocChip (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I promise that I am not a sock of Greenock125. MintChocChip (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
MintChocChip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise if I am unblocked I will agree to any condition, listen to advice, be a constructive editor and read the rules and guidelines, please think about this offer carefully instead of just declining it.
Decline reason:
It looks like you've already had your final chance, and didn't use it well. The word "final" means "last," which means, after that, there aren't any more. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
editPlease give me one final chance on Wikipedia I really want to be a part of it. MintChocChip (talk) 17:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- I believe the "final chance" was given here: User talk:Andy593. - eo (talk) 17:33, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Is anyone listening to me I want one FINAL chance please. --MintChocChip (talk) 17:39, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Retiring?
editThat template doesn't really make any sense on this talk page; 'retiring' is a choice to stop editing Wikipedia. You're indefinitely blocked. If you want, feel free to replace this talk page with the {{indef}} template, please feel free to do that; it's the one that makes sense on this talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)