Mint eggy93
Hello, Mint eggy93, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
How to proceed when your edit is reverted
editHi Mint eggy93. I see that you're relatively new to Wikipedia, so I wanted to explain this more directly to you after your recent edits at Mamluk Sultanate. In the future, if one of your edits is reverted, you are expected to start a discussion on the talk page, where you can provide more explanation about why you think your edit is correct. I've started one for you at Talk:Mamluk Sultanate. If during discussion there is a consensus among editors to accept your change after this, then it can proceed. If there is no consensus, then we must all accept that the proposed change will not proceed. If you react by simply repeating your edit again, however, this results in edit-warring (see Wikipedia:Edit warring), a process that does bring any further clarity and leaves the original problems unresolved. You can also look at Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which explains how this consensus-building practice usually works. I hope this helps. Sincerely, R Prazeres (talk) 19:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)