MisterFixerUpper
November 2019
editHello, I'm Karl 334. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2019 Albania earthquake, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 22:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2019 Albania earthquake. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- My name is MisterFixerUpper. As you miğht expect from my username, my main job here is to fix thinğs. It is not personal commentary, thouğh. It is simply extra information. It's no different than the news sayinğ that "there was an earthquake in the Balkan nation of Albania," or somethinğ like that. It's just explaining where a place is to others. MisterFixerUpper (talk) 22:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Yes, sir. I apologize if I broke any of Wikipedia's rules. I agree to refrain from editinğ that page entirely. I agree to stop editinğ Wikipedia. That's it; I quit, goodbye. MisterFixerUpper (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
Your persistence is amazinğ; you are one of my role modles NationalPride987 (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC) |
November 2019
editNote that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.