MisterJay123

MisterJay123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MisterJay123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brock Lesnar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endorsement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brock Lesnar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Godfather. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Sources

Hi. Here is the list of the sources used by the project. As you can see, Wrestling Inc is unreliable. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brock Lesnar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cole. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dwayne Johnson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dwayne Johnson. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dwayne Johnson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/dwayne-the-rock-johnson-breaks-7688292|publisher=Uproxx]|accessdate=January 26, 2015}}</ref> The Rock was then aided by the returning [[John Cena]] to fend

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Jones (basketball player), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Frank Ramsey and Sam Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eddie Bravo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nick Diaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Xavier Woods ‎ , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MisterJay123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Randy Orton

Let's not start an edit war and start a discuss. If we follow the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, then why are you removing half of accomplishments in the lead (his 2009 Royal Rumble win, The SD Tag Team win) and replacing it with unnecessary and otherwise redundant additions. (In 2017, Orton won his second Royal Rumble match and joined Hulk Hogan, Shawn Michaels, Stone Cold Steve Austin, Triple H, Batista, and John Cena as the only multiple-time Royal Rumble winners in WWE history. He then won the WWE Championship from Bray Wyatt at WrestleMania 33.) It clearly does not make sense, from my POV at least. Nickag989^talk 16:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thoughts on the new edit? MisterJay123 (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Still not statisfied. I much preffered when there was this part *Orton became a member of the stable Evolution shortly after his WWE debut, which quickly led to an Intercontinental Championship reign, his first title with the company. He also acquired the moniker "The Legend Killer" during a storyline where he began disrespecting and then physically attacking WWE Hall of Famers and wrestling veterans. At age 24, he became the youngest person ever to hold the World Heavyweight Championship. With this win, he departed from Evolution and a feud with his former stablemates began. In 2006, Orton joined forces with Edge in a tag team known as Rated-RKO. Together, they held the World Tag Team Championship. After Rated-RKO disbanded in mid-2007, Orton gained two WWE Championship reigns in one night, when at 27 he became the youngest two-time WWE Champion. He formed the group The Legacy with Cody Rhodes and Ted DiBiase in 2008. It disbanded in 2010 and Orton returned to singles competition. From 2013 to 2015, Orton was aligned with The Authority, who named him the "face of the WWE". In late 2016 he joined The Wyatt Family, winning the WWE SmackDown Tag Team Championship with stablemates Bray Wyatt and Luke Harper before turning on Wyatt in February 2017. Nickag989^talk 16:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

• • Stuff like the Legend Killer, Legacy and Authority should be the names of the sections below his pro wrestling career section. You are more than welcome to change those. MisterJay123 (talk) 16:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Then why did you revert me? You didn't realize that you violated the 3RR. Nickag989^talk 16:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

References

April 2017

Your recent editing history at Randy Orton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nickag989^talk 16:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MisterJay123 reported by User:Nickag989 (Result: ). Thank you. Nickag989^talk 16:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Randy Orton". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 30 April 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 16:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Randy Orton, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 23:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MisterJay123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Rhasaan Orange does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 22:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Colby Covington

Hi MisterJay123, Greetings to you. I have removed content which did not "directly" indicate the content as claim and U tube is not considered indepedent, reliable source. Being vocal, is not considered "fight style". Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you recently removed content from Matt Hughes (fighter) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you recently removed content from Demetrious Johnson (fighter) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Frank Mir, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Daniel Cormier, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jon Jones. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Dan Severn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mark Coleman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Tito Ortiz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:39, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Antônio Rodrigo Nogueira, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at B.J. Penn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Georges St-Pierre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 12:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Tony Ferguson, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MisterJay123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Colin Kaepernick, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per WP:LABEL, "controversial" should be avoided, and instead just describe what the actual issue is. —Bagumba (talk) 11:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tom Brady. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per MOS:NICKNAME, "obvious" nicknames like Tom do not need to be quoted in the lead. —Bagumba (talk) 01:24, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Tom Brady

Sorry about the revert and immediate self-revert afterwards - I was looking at the wrong edit when I undid it. Your edits should be back the way they were. Tarl N. (discuss) 17:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Kingston

Thank you for taking the time to improve professional wrestling articles. Check out WP:PW/RS to find out what sources should be used to cite in articles. Bleacher Report is considered unreliable. StaticVapor message me! 23:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Also I retagged the lead. You improved it forsure, but the last paragraph is poor. The lead should summarize his career not just list championships. StaticVapor message me! 00:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

TheFamousPeople.com as a source

Hi MisterJay123. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Kofi Kingston. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). IMDB is similarly unreliable, as documented at WP:RSP. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 18:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 20:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kofi Kingston shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. StaticVapor message me! 00:56, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dave Bautista. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Eddie Bravo. Basically, BLP violations: fluff and nonsense sourced to YouTube etc. Drmies (talk) 14:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

The user has vandalized article History of WWE, reported disruptive editing to AIV. Dilbaggg (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at John Cena, you may be blocked from editing. StaticVapor message me! 07:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

• The source you cited mentions that they changed to PG, but with no mention of Cena or his gimmick transition in the source it violates WP:NOR. StaticVapor message me! 07:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurt Angle. StaticVapor message me! 22:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

• Lets start with, you make positive edits around here. The content you added is in fact true. However, when you add content to BLPs you need to cite sources so the information can be verified. Otherwise it just sits there unsourced. You were blocked for this already, the next block will probably be longer. StaticVapor message me! 22:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Eddie Guerrero. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 02:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rey Mysterio, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dwayne Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kenny Omega. StaticVapor message me! 01:07, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

You need to stop removing sourced content

I seriously considered blocking you, probably for a month, but I haven't. IF you do it again though, don't be surprised if you get blocked. Doug Weller talk 09:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

The next block is likely to be indefinite - Wikipedia isn't a forum for promoting conspiracy theories. Acroterion (talk) 16:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MisterJay123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I have been blocked by those prejudiced against conspiracy theories. All I did was edit conspiracy theory to make it less biased sounding and more adherent to Wikipedia's neutral point of view standards. MisterJay123 (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You edit warred and removed sourced information; this has nothing to do with anyone else other than yourself. Since you don't seem to concede that you did anything wrong, there is no cause to remove the block, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MisterJay123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe Wikipedia admins are nerds that live in denial and deny factual true conspiracies like the Gulf of Tonkin and Operation Mockingbird. MisterJay123 (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. Obvious troll is obvious; talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

If you continue to use this page for personal attacks, I will remove your talk page access and make the block indefinite. 331dot (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

How come the "when other explanations are more probable" part of the Wiki definition isn't in the offical disctionary or google part of the definition in conspiracy theory(? Is it possible it's because Wikipedia admins are widely prejudiced against all conspiracy theories?(MisterJay123 (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

I would like an admin who doesn't deny factual true conspiracy theories exist to review my block.MisterJay123 (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

You only need one open request. Any subsequent comments you make should be standard, unformatted comments. There is no such thing as a "factual true conspiracy theory", if a theory is true, it is no longer a theory. I suggest that you focus on your block itself instead of others or you are not going to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: Do you hate conspiracy theories, yes or no? MisterJay123 (talk) 16:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Since you are declining to address the reason for the block, I have removed your talk page access and made the block indef. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)