Mister ricochet
Zip
Laughter
editI like your sense of humour, Mister ricochet, but not that photo on your main page. Graphic, to say the least. :) --andreasegde (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Lennon's drug use
editSee the John Lennon talk page. Thanks. --andreasegde (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
the image
editshould not be used that way. Please revert it. WP is not censored, but user space is supposed to be non-offensive. I'm perhaps the most friendly admin you could find here to the use of sexual content images as appropriate, but this just is not. Please remove it yourself, to avoid more of a fuss than necessary. DGG (talk) 08:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I sort of understand what you mean (If you're talking about the vagina picture) however, How can someone be offended by such a picture? It is a Commons picture which is legal to use on Wikipedia, I've seen some really disturbing user pages. And it isn't like a pornograpic picture, it's a explanitorial picture. So I ask you to reconsider my plea, as I love that picture. I did however, remove the caption. Perhaps Tvoz would rather me post a penis picture. I am up to doing a total anatomy page, I probably started in the wrong area... Mister ricochet (talk) 14:16, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Here's an idea--do an anatomy sub-page. & move it there. If people don't like it, they can bring it up for deletion at MfD and the community can decide. DGG (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Image:Lennon1980.jpg
editI have and submitted the information to used the photo. If there is any problems, you could contact David Spindel (the photographer) at dbspindel@cox.net perhaps that would help you. Mister ricochet (talk) 14:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
December, 2007
editThe way you have been talking at the Lennon talk page is not acceptable, and I am sure you know it. There are enough genuine problems here without trying to provoke people. It cannot continue, no matter how verbally ingenious you may be. If it starts again, on any page, you will be blocked to prevent further disruption. DGG (talk) 18:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Can you please issue the same warning to Arcayne? Thanks. All is understood. Mister ricochet (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
editYou have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mister_ricochet for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. 3rd instance of sock-puppeteering by SixString1965/Realsanpaku,etc. Arcayne (cast a spell) 08:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Animal.gif
editAn image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Animal.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - Jehochman Talk 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Sockpupptry
editThis account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Sixstring1965 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to Checkuser for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mister ricochet and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mister ricochet. - Jehochman Talk 14:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ysubposter.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Ysubposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)