MitchCluck

Wikipedia rules on original research

Your edit here to the 2006 North Korean nuclear test article appears to be you promoting a technology and information which you have not independently published elsewhere and which is not supported by other reliable and verifyable sources.

Wikipedia is not for many things - including not being a publisher of any original research. Our keys here are verifyable information, from reliable sources elsewhere.

Please do not insert information into Wikipedia which was not published elsewhere in a reliable form. I am fairly involved in the nuclear proliferation research community and am not aware of any publication of yours of this technology you state you used to analyze their test. If you have published it somewhere, in a peer reviewed venue, please provide references for the publication. We will need to be able to verify what you said and check that the sources are independent and reliable.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)