Mjesticfalco

August 2022

Hello,

I was just asking if there was a particular reason why this edit was considered to be not constructive, as it was undoing another user's edit that appeared to be fairly obvious vandalism.

Thanks. Mjesticfalco (talk) 01:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Mjesticfalco! My sincere apologies. Your edit was completely in order and I removed my message to the contrary from this page. Unfortunately the vandal did more vandalism that you noticed and corrected. So what I saw was an article with some vandalism and you were the person who had just changed it and wrongly assumed you had done that vandalism. I then realised my mistake and cleaned up the vandalism, but I forgot about the automated message you would have received. Sadly the article History of Qantas has a very long history of vandalism and so I am on a hair-trigger of "oh no, not again". I should have taken more care. I am sorry. Kerry (talk) 00:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)