Mlc1968

August 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Human rights in Ukraine, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.
Please note that there are talk pages for discussing content. Do not just remove content then revert to your own version after you've been reverted. Follow WP:BRD. Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Human rights in Ukraine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I strongly suggest that you self-revert until discussion of the content has come to a conclusion on the talk page. You are engaged in a slow edit war over the same content and have been reverted by 3 individual editors over your changes to the content. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Human rights in Ukraine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted.
I have already brought this up, yet you continue to fail to read edit summaries and are persisting in edit warring content without responding on the talk page with anything other than WP:NOTGETTINGIT retorts. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Crimean status referendum, 2014, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop treating articles as if they were about your personal opinion and introducing weasel words to change the meaning and veracity of the content. If you have reliable sources for there being a mainstream understanding of annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation as being deemed to be legal by the international community, feel free to bring your sources to the talk page of the article for discussion. Do not, however, simply change article content in order to introduce blatant lies. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)