Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do. Sceptre (Talk) 14:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Under Construction ?

edit

Try the {{inuse}} tag. Don't abuse it, though. Please quickly expand your articles to assert notability of the subjects, or poor articles will be deleted. Good luck. Happy editing. -- PFHLai 15:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Winfield Entertainment Group

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Winfield Entertainment Group article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! NickelShoe (Talk) 19:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Apparently you have never studied Copyright Law - Copying a website only infringes copyright if the information is copyright protected. In this case, no one has asserted copyright. As well, the information put forward is asserted by the company as fact...that alone puts it into the realm of public material. Facts cannot be copyrighted...this is basic in copyright law. Finally, information taken for research or study purposes, in Canada and the US, can be copied fairly liberally before copyright is infringed. Before discussing a subject you do not understand, please take time to do the background research.
I'm no lawyer, but that's not really relevant. Please review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NickelShoe (Talk) 14:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just curious

edit

Doing some legwork on the BC Legislature Raids article, which you contributed some edits to last fall; I see from your user page that you teach in Sherbrooke; there's no Lebrun listed at Bishop's, while at U.Sherbrooke there are several (though without the accented Lé-); just wondering which one you are and what your area of academic interest/expertise is. And also, given your location in Quebec, what your interest in this most-BC of all political scandals might happen to be. It's not as if it's in the headlines in the rest of the country (or in BC for that matter, thanks to nat'l media monpoly muzzling...).Skookum1 00:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bruce Clark (actor)

edit
 

The article Bruce Clark (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable with only one significant part.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 22:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply