Mmmzeta0

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Riemann hypothesis, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Also, please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:37, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Thank you for your contribution to Ewing's sarcoma, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:37, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

How was anything I said perceived at all as any kind of a joke? I was discussing a cancer common in children. What is wrong with you to accuse me of a "joke edit"? Mmmzeta0 (talk) 06:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Your edit summary on this edit was inappropriate; it came across more like a parody of The Lord of the Rings than a proper explanation of your edit. However, on further reflection, the main concern with the edit is that the material you introduced needed to be supported with reliable sources (WP:V). If you wish to reintroduce the changes in question, please provide or identify some references (and a clearer, appropriate edit summary). Dl2000 (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Let me assure you I unlike the sort of prowl at Wikipedia one Dl2000 find little humor in children's cancer, or the censorship of good knowledge for reasons empowered by ignorance on a mass scale. Mmmzeta0 (talk) 05:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rooted binary tree

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rooted binary tree requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Albert7777 ^(Talk) 09:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)