Moegfan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trendhim (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Novem Linguae was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trendhim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trendhim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 10:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Moegfan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Trendhim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Trendhim, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 15:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moegfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

New and better text with more citations to reliable sources such as newspapers and books, that go into several paragraphs of detail about this company. Moegfan (talk) 07:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked as a paid editor. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 08:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there

If unblocked, I will do my utmost to create a better text with more citations to reliable sources that go into several more paragraphs of detail about the company.

If the text still does not live up to the expectations of a good Wikipedia entry after that, I will not ask for another unblock, if blocked again.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,

Moegfan

Moegfan (talk) 07:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

New and better text with more citations to reliable sources such as newspapers and books, that go into several paragraphs of detail about this company

Hi there

If unblocked, I will do my utmost to create a better text with more citations to reliable sources that go into several more paragraphs of detail about the company.

If the text still does not live up to the expectations of a good Wikipedia entry after that, I will not ask for another unblock, if blocked again.

I understand that I have been blocked as a paid editor. In my daily work I work as a OSO at Trendhim, which is shipping products to 27 countries around the world. That is why I thought, that the entry was valuable to Wikipedia (that the company was "big enough" to be mentioned here). I know of the high expectations for content posted on Wikipedia, so I did not expect it to be easy to have the content accepted.

Again, if unblocked I will do my very best to live up to the expectations. If you feel those are not met and you block me again, I will not try to get unblocked again.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Moegfan

Moegfan (talk) 06:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Did you get a chance to review my unblock request?

Hi Wikipedia

I take the liberty to contact you again about my unblock request, as it has been about a month since I requested it.

Is it possible to be unblocked? If not, I will not contact you again :)

Thank you :)

Here is the original message:

Hi there

If unblocked, I will do my utmost to create a better text with more citations to reliable sources that go into several more paragraphs of detail about the company.

If the text still does not live up to the expectations of a good Wikipedia entry after that, I will not ask for another unblock, if blocked again.

I understand that I have been blocked as a paid editor. In my daily work I work as a OSO at Trendhim, which is shipping products to 27 countries around the world. That is why I thought, that the entry was valuable to Wikipedia (that the company was "big enough" to be mentioned here). I know of the high expectations for content posted on Wikipedia, so I did not expect it to be easy to have the content accepted.

Again, if unblocked I will do my very best to live up to the expectations. If you feel those are not met and you block me again, I will not try to get unblocked again.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Moegfan

Moegfan (talk) 06:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)