Mohinani88

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepak Kanyalal Nandwani (March 6)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepak Kanyalal Nandwani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the You can also get [https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/?nick=WPhelp?#wikipedia-en-help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Mohinani88, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Victim86 04:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

-+\ Hi I am totally lost as to what exactly is Wikipedia expecting from me to verify that the information submitted is genuine and is totally non bias.

The sources of the information provided are not in anyway related to the individual or company that the article is on. They are extracted from 2 separate magazines published in 1987.

In fact the author of the 2 magazines is no longer working for them and the other article is extracted from the notice column of the straits times (the main local newspaper in Singapore) from 2013.

Our independent does your office want these articles to be?

I could forward soft copies of these articles to your office if necessary.

Yours Faithfully

Victim 86

````

Add topic