Mohit Dokania
Welcome!
edit
|
August 2024
editHi Mohit Dokania! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sat-Sudra that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeraxmoira Those were internal wikilinks and not external links. Mohit Dokania (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- The two links you added to "Praveśaka (on sanskrit grammar), Karaṇottamam(more)" are not interwikilinks or citations; they are external links. If you are unaware, please read through Wikipedia:External links and familiarize yourself with the guidelines. WP:ELLIST will show you how to add external links to lists. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste and related articles
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Nomination of List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
editHello! Mohit Dokania,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
|
October 2024
editYour recent editing history at Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Regards, Aafi (talk) 12:53, 15 October 2024 (UTC)