Mol5136

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Mol5136, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

  Introduction

 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia

  How to edit a page

  Help

  Tips

  How to write a great article

  Manual of Style

  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Thank you for the addition of the article on William Crano, but please familiarize yourself with WP:NOTABILITY. Be advised that if you cannot provide sources to both establish the article's subject as notable and the content of the article as fact, that it may be subject do deletion. Viable sources of citation can be found at WP:CITE. Thanks again for your contribution to Wikipedia, and if you have any questions not answered above, feel free to ask me or another editor on the user talk page. :) ZachPG 22:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey, just FYI, DDG has added some references to your page. Also, if you have a problem with losing your work, have you considered the "show preview" button to hang on to what you've done, or copy-pasting it into word or a similar program and then re-pasting the whole thing into your browser when you're ready? Just some suggestions, unless I misunderstood what you said on the article's talk page. ZachPG 02:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Photos

How do I get a photo to stay when I have the permission of the individual in the photo to use it? They keep getting deleted... I've tried several licensing options but obviously not the right one? Mol5136 18:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Hogg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Hogg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hogg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Removing sources

Please refrain form deleting reliable sources s you did at Ayman Mohyeldin. You may not like Fox News, you may not like the fact that Ayman Mohyeldin is being criticized by a major news network. But arbitrarily removing such material from a page is Wikipedia:Disruptive editing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

I see that you are a very occasional editor. You are welcome to contribute, but you might want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia before again removing material from this or other pages.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Fox News "source" was an opinion piece not a news article. This is not about like or don't like. This about using reliable sources not opinions. Mol5136 (talk) 14:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

• Talk pages exist for disputes like this. Do not remove well-sourced material withoutdiscussing it first. Deleting material as you did is not acceptable behavior. And you really should take this to the talk page, as I did a few hours ago, rather than getting aggressive on my talk page. I suggest that you now show good faith by restoring the article and the reliable sources (news articles) that you have deleted.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

who is aggressive? I'm not being aggressive. I'm trying to find ways to include what you want without erring toward the bias of opinion. Stay with the facts.Mol5136 (talk) 16:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Stewart Donaldson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stewart Donaldson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Donaldson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sarrail (talk) 05:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)