Hi,
You included a non-Unicode (private-use) character at stereoelectronic effect, in "the n(O) σ*(Ccarbonyl–Caryl)". Bots had been skipping the article because of it, so I replaced it with [?]. Could you fix? Thanks. — kwami (talk) 00:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Cool. I've been spacing the arrows, and changed some of the >'s to arrows. You might want to verify those weren't mistakes. I can see how using "→" for both reaction and trends might be confusing, but then using ">" for both trends and numerical comparison could also be confusing. Is there maybe a third symbol that could be used? Or is that what the lack of spacing is for? — kwami (talk) 00:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)