Moogleluvr

Better late than never; Welcome!

Welcome! Hello, Moogleluvr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: User pages The five pillars of Wikipedia Wikipedia in nine words How to edit a page (or, the quick cheatsheet version) Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Glossary What Wikipedia is not Assume good faith Wikiquette Sandbox (this page is for testing) Your first article I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing! If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page! Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages: Wikipedia:Community portal Wikipedia:WikiProjects Best of luck to you, and happy editing! – Luna Santin (talk) 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

your recent edits

Interesting after about 1 edit in 2.5 years you return just to edit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir Skate Longboard Shop . LibStar (talk) 07:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

• As a user of Wikipedia, I believe I've maintained the right to contribute to the discussion of a topic that I have interest in, would you not agree? Or is my very user-ship questionable as well? Moogleluvr (talk) 05:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

just curious that you come back to participate in one AfD and nothing else that has been subject to blatant canvassing. LibStar (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

• Here I must call into question the definition and the purpose of the label "canvassing". If Wikipedia relies upon the quality of arguments versus the quantity of arguments made in the favor of keeping/deleting an article, then a mass of recruited sheeple should have no effect on the quality of the discussion, by merit of the fact that they contribute little to the discussion.

As well, by the same token, if Wikipedia welcomes all to contribute their points to the discussion, then I see little difference between a well-argued point drawn from recruitment/"canvassing", and from one who stumbles upon the discussion. In fact, a recruited contributor to the debate may very well have better, more well-versed points to contribute to the discussion than a random contributor due to their involvement in said subject. Moogleluvr (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir Skate Longboard Shop (2nd nomination)

Hi, Moogleluvr. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir Skate Longboard Shop, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir Skate Longboard Shop (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)