Mooseman2
Mooseman2, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Mooseman2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Crime in Richmond, Virginia
editA tag has been placed on Category:Crime in Richmond, Virginia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
New message from Shearonink
editYou are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth Van Lew § Recent additions of this article to Category:Crime and Punishment in Richmond, Virginia. Shearonink (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024
editHi Mooseman2! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Donnie Corker that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. I reverted your "minor" edits where you added some substantial content with problematic terminology and unsourced quotes. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donnie_Corker&oldid=1197955106 For example, saying someone "suffered" from spinal meningitis, isn't really encyclopedic see WP:SUFFER, as it is adding undue tone to a medical condition. And saying that his mother mispronounced this condition as "spider mites of Jesus", needs a source, and arguably, it doesn't add anything of value to the article other than to make fun of someone's education. Mason (talk) 01:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- I put a source. The documentary. Mooseman2 (talk) 01:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- You did not include it in that edit [1], nor was it clear from the context where it came from. Regardless, as I noted there are several problems with this edit. Mason (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)