Morgemonster

Welcome!

Hello, Morgemonster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Culturescapes, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gaijin42 (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

{{help me}} Hi Gaijin42 thanks for your message. Why can the article Culturescapes not be retained? I did look at the Your first article page and I tried my best to make a good start to the article. Please be aware it is not finished yet, but I ran out of time. I spent quite long on it and would really appreciate it if it was not deleted. Can you tell me what's wrong with the article so I can fix it?

Thanks --Morgemonster (talk) 17:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

The main issue is WP:NOTABILITY. You have in included 3 references in your article. All of these are WP:PRIMARY WP:SELFPUBLISHED sources. We need 3rd party WP:RELIABLESOURCES to ensure both WP:NOTABILITY and WP:VERIFIABILITY. If you are aware of good sources (preferably independent books, magazines, in depth newspaper articles etc) you can add them to the article, which may result in the article being kept. If the article is deleted, you may ask the deleting admin to userfy the article for you, so you can continue to improve it in your userspace. After that I would suggest Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation as a good place to get feedback on the article to see if it is up to standards before it gets moved back into article space. Let me know if you have further questions. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Gaijin42 Right, I see. I do have third party sources (newspapers etc.), but did not have time to add them yet. I can add them tomorrow. Thanks for your answers and advice! --Morgemonster (talk) 18:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Gaijin42

I've edited the article and included more third party sources. Is it ok now? If yes, how can I get the deletion tag to be removed?

--Morgemonster (talk) 11:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

The article no longer qualifies for WP:SPEEDY deletion, but is still generally borderline. The basellandschaftliche Zeitung and time out Israel references are good, but that is pretty much it for refs that qualify. The badische-zeitung ref is really about the play, not Culturescapes so doesn't show much WP:NOTABILITY. The vast majority of the sources used are WP:PRIMARY documents that are WP:SELFPUBLISHED by the group itself (Also, since so many of the sources are that way, it raises the possibility of a WP:COI issue, re you associated/employed by the group?). Others are press releases, or from sites affiliated or cooperating with the group and therefore failing the independence test. The BDS item is a also WP:PRIMARY (Although kudos to the program for standing up against BDS)

For now the page won't be deleted, but in its current state it is likely to be deleted in the future. Wikipedia is not a marketing brochure. If the information is not WP:VERIFIABLE from WP:SECONDARY sources, it should be removed. The article should be repeating the content made in WP:SECONDARY WP:RELIABLESOURCES if there are only two, its likely to be nominated for deletion again in the future. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Gaijin42

I thought for my first article, it would be easier to work from an existing wikipedia article in a different language (German), to get used to all the formatting etc. I know there are a lot of self-published primary sources, but some I included to expand on the individual festival programs. (Festival edition listings). Of course the Badische Zeitung ref is about the play being performed as part of the festival. That reference is specifically about the Frljic play, which is why the foot note is placed just after the name of the artist. There is also a ref by the swiss government (DEZA, SPD in English) and the Chinese Embassy, but I will try to improve the article by finding more secondary sources... Many thanks for your help.

--Morgemonster (talk) 15:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Culturescapes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Culturescapes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jurriaan Cooiman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jurriaan Cooiman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  16:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Jurriaan Cooiman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jurriaan Cooiman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jurriaan Cooiman

Hello, Morgemonster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jurriaan Cooiman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)