User talk:Morriswa/Cup submissions

Challenge request

edit

I would like to challenge the claiming of South Carolina Highway 3 Business for a point, as it is not its own article. --Rschen7754 01:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Redirects don't get any points? Also, did I put the proper number of points for the main article? South Carolina is below the USRD average for WikiWork. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 01:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Challenge accepted. If we gave points for redirects, everyone would be creating redirects and not working on the articles. Yes, you had the right number of points. –Fredddie 02:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Georgia State Route 313

edit

What needs to be corrected on the article? Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 01:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking for more effort than a three-sentence route description. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect more than three sentences for 22 miles. –Fredddie 02:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Challenge request

edit

Veterans Parkway (Savannah, Georgia) is a county route, and should only get 2.5 points. I also am concerned about the route description: it could be folded into the lead easily, and thus would be a stub. The road parallels a military base that isn't even mentioned in the article. --Rschen7754 03:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Challenge accepted. I agree with the Rschen's assessment that this is basically a county road stub and Georgia has enough articles that need improving. Normally, as a county road, it would get half points, but since it's really a stub, too, I'm giving it zero points. –Fredddie 04:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Challenge request

edit

Fort Washington Way should only get 2 points, not 5 points. Also, it could be easily merged into Interstate 71.Dough4872 04:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to challenge this as the article doesn't need to exist. I have reduced it from an article to a set index. Imzadi 1979  05:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Challenge accepted. No points. –Fredddie 22:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possible challenge/request for inspection

edit

A few of the recent stub-to-C submissions show the replacement of GDOT sources with Google Maps. Is there a reason why the GDOT sources are not usable? —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 03:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't have a problem with it. He's been replacing a report that is now 11 years old and is no longer available on GDOT's website. If the GeoTRAQS website worked as it's supposed to, this would be a different answer. –Fredddie 00:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply