April 2008

edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Motion graphics review, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Qworty (talk) 13:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: motion graphics review, Article

edit

hello i would like to do the page properly in orther not to get adverticing, if you want i can delete the external links, i think that people who wants to show its video projects can find this wiki and get famous, our association dont earn money, so we dont make profit of it but the authors, can you help me redoing it ? i have little idea :P

thanks.

Motiongraphicsreview (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Motion graphics review was deleted because it was an advertizement. Wikipedia is not a soapbox and does not allow advertizements. It is open for you to recreate the page but you need to write from a neutral point of view, and cite reliable sources to comply with our verifiability policy.
Also, it is not usual to place an article about an organization on Wikipedia in the hope of getting famous. It must be notable first. Not the other way around. Consider writing about your organization on its own website. Stifle (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
sorry for the inconvenience... but this organization is international and the most important enterprises of the world who creates motion graphics are exposing their works in this festival, isn't enough notable ? yo can check it at the web page of the "festival cine de huesca" webpage it has been recogniced by Hollywood awards as a well named festival, please reconsider if i can /cant do the wiki. Thanks in advance.
Motiongraphicsreview (talk) 10:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am not stopping you from recreating the article — it isn't my decision — but if you do not cite some reliable sources it is just as likely to be deleted again. I don't know what "festival cine de huesca" means, please provide an exact URL. Stifle (talk) 10:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply