Speedy deletion of Why it should have been Greg instead

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Why it should have been Greg instead, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mazeau (talk) 22:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2008

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Caitlin. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OnoremDil 22:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Back at it again, I see. Do you really want me to tell your mom about this? NawlinWiki (talk) 22:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply