Mr.Clicky

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as ABC Enterprises, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! Adam ^(talk) 23:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Sydney- SMH

Hi there. Could you explain why you removed the "libertarian" from the description of SMH but not the "centrist"? --Sumple 09:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

The entry on EPI is for informatinal purposes as is the link to the website I inserted. The website linked to is an informational/educational resourse for the guardians of digs with EPI and contains numerous citable articles and information on further non-commercial resources. It is not 'a platform for advertising or promotion'. From my understanding it complies with the guidelines on the following counts:

"Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.

3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic (sic) understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[2] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_can_normally_be_linked

thanks, I'd appreciate its reinstatement in the furtherance of knowledge of this debilitating condition.

Mr.Clicky (talk) 07:21, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Mr.Clicky

Hi,

The entry on EPI is for informatinal purposes as is the link to the website I inserted. The website linked to is an informational/educational resourse for the guardians of digs with EPI and contains numerous citable articles and information on further non-commercial resources. It is not 'a platform for advertising or promotion'. From my understanding it complies with the guidelines on the following counts:

"Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.

3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic (sic) understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[2] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_can_normally_be_linked

thanks, I'd appreciate its reinstatement in the furtherance of knowledge of this debilitating condition.

Mr.Clicky (talk) 07:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Mr.Clicky

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency with this edit do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 06:21, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

March 2012

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Cameron Scott (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)