{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2009 (UTC){{unblock|This is clearly an abusive block. I have only reverted plain vandalism by an unconstructive user who started a revert war without any discussion or cause. The article Bernhard Weiß needs to be a disambiguation page because the obscure musician promoted by User:Katieh5584 is not the most famous Bernhard Weiß (Bernhard Weiß (police executive) is). I request that User:Katieh5584 is blocked. Mr. Bergerac (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)}}
Removing content regardless is vandalism, and you need to gain CONSENSUS from other wikipedia editors before you or anyone removes material from a page. Also blaming other people in an unblock request won't get you unblocked, please read WP:NOTTHEM. Momo san Gespräch 20:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- I suspect there was a misunderstanding - I'll unblock if you agree to solve the problem on the talk page instead of reverting. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- ok Mr. Bergerac (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've unblocked your account. Have a look at the comment on Katieh5584's talk page - I think this was just a misunderstanding. PhilKnight (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think so too -- but Mr. Bergerac really needs to respond to, or at least acknowledge, warning messages rather than simply deleting them as "vandalism" and "trolling". --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've unblocked your account. Have a look at the comment on Katieh5584's talk page - I think this was just a misunderstanding. PhilKnight (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- ok Mr. Bergerac (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)