Mr0t1633

Please feel free to give me advice on my edits below.Mr0t1633 (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Medieval Bulgarian army

Hi! What exactly do you mean with "vague" so that I can fix it? --Gligan (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Aha; thanks, I will fix it ;-) Best, --Gligan (talk) 22:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Adrenergic storm

Hi - interesting article! I have nominated a fact from it for the Did You Know? section of the front page (see here for the nomination). Hopefully the article will thereby get some main-page exposure. I have done a small copyedit to put full stops before the reference markers. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm glad to know someone already found my article. If it really were to make it on the front page DYK section I would be quite flattered. Your edits are much appreciated; while I may be able to write well, I'm not good with formatting, etc. Again, thanks for the compliment and the nomination! Mr0t1633 (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations on the new article! It looks good. Unfortunately, I have concerns about whether the Taser mention is accurate, so I started a discussion at Talk:Adrenergic storm#Taser. Flatscan (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply there, and for understanding my rationale for the removal. I try to discuss, then edit, but I was concerned that the unsupported association would propagate. I left Hassocks5489 a note so that he may suggest an alternate DYK hook; if he doesn't by tomorrow, I'll try my hand at it. Happy editing! Flatscan (talk) 04:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

On 20 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Adrenergic storm, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nice job! Welcome! Hope to see many more from you! --Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Woah! Thanks everybody! I sure didn't expect the article to get noticed, but it's nice to get some attention; I've been making minor edits for years, most before I even had an account. I'll keep on with my constant grammar edits and when I find the right article to expand or create, I hope to do a good job on it regardless of how much it is noticed. Mr0t1633 (talk) 05:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations on your article making DYK! Flatscan (talk) 18:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Reply etiquette

Not having ever used talk pages before the adrenergic storm article, I don't know whether it's appropriate to respond to a comment such as the above by Flatscan on his user talk page (which is what I did, IIRC) or here on the page from which the comment originated. Anyone who could answer this, I would appreciate very much. Thanks - Mr0t1633 (talk) 12:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Your response on my talk page was fine. Editing a user's talk page triggers the orange You have new messages banner. Some users describe their preferences at the top of their talk page, sometimes using a template like {{Usertalkback}}. Some users prefer to keep discussion with the first message, using {{Talkback}} to notify the other user. Unless the other user has declared a preference, I just leave my replies on their talk page, although I may copy the two sides together later. Hope this answers your question. Flatscan (talk) 00:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Finn Malmgren

I'd added the requested reference. The rumours were not limited to the contemporary tabloid press, František Běhounek in his book about the expedition written in 1928 expressed a vague suspicion too. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 19:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know; in any case where i mark a (fact) i'd rather see the content cited than eventually deleted. Good to see the latter episode for once! Thanks again. Mr0t1633 (talk) 06:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Afro-hair structure

Hello,

I dug up some sources to fix the structure section of the Afro-hair page. In truth, not much is known about how the textures differ biochemically because they can't go in to look at the molecules without destroying the structure. Mostly, they know that all three hair textures (extremely straight, wavy, and tightly coiled) contain the same "stuff" as far as they can tell. Franbourg et al (who I cite) is thus pretty bold in suggesting that the lipids in Afro-hair, while identical in chemical make up and quantity, might differ in their distribution. Thus, I decided to cite their work...I noticed that you mentioned that that entire cite needs work. What other suggestions do you have for fixing it?

Thanks, Afiya27 (talk) 13:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Hegemony

I agree with you. So let's clean it up as you implied. --Ludvikus (talk) 16:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, was just reviewing talk page and, yknow, life. I'd be up still for improving the article or whatever the appropriate term is. However, yeah, small apologies/sorry for, hrm, could say 'leading you on?' Hey, it's cool. Mr0t1633 (talk) 09:18, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Triphenylene

I notice that in this edit from last year you change "triphenylene" to "diphenylene" while reworking one paragraph of the article. Was this just a mistake or is there some reason that "diphenylene" is what belongs there? I thought I'd ask instead of just switching it. -- Why Not A Duck 19:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for the reply. I've gone and fixed it. -- Why Not A Duck 19:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Butane torch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Organic and Sublimate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)