MrThunderbolt1000T
Welcome!
edit
|
April 2019
edit Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Midway Atoll, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See "MODIS Web: Home >> Images >> Midway Islands". modis.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2019-04-07. {{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(help) for a US Government citation stating Midway is not part of the State of Hawaiʻi. Peaceray (talk) 16:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
June 2020
editPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Mississippi State Penitentiary, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editRfC - scope and title for the American Revolutionary War article
editI am forwarding this RfC notice to you, along with the ongoing Discussion Summary Chart because you are listed as a History Project member interested in American history. The RfC and discussion is found at Talk:American Revolutionary War. Please feel free to delete this notice if it does not fit your current interests. - TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
American Revolutionary War, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
A. "American Revolutionary War” | B. "War of the American Revolution" |
---|---|
continuity - used at this WP article and sister articles for 19 years - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America - participants British & US Congress with respective allies, auxiliaries & combatants - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US: independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure - results - US independence & republic; Britain the biggest US trade partner & finances US expanding business & Treasury - reliable scholarly reference Britannica for the general reader - prominent adherents - all 15 history Pulitzer winner scholars on the topic |
modern update - uses 'vast majority of sources' found in a browser search - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America, spread to Anglo-Bourbon (Fr.&Sp.) War-across worldwide empires, Fourth Anglo-Dutch War-North Atlantic, Second Mysore War-Indian subcontinent & Ocean - participants British & US Congress, France, Spain, Dutch Republic, Kingdom of Mysore - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure -- Bourbons: Gibraltar, Jamaica, Majorca, expand Gambia trade, expand India trade -- Dutch - free trade with North America & Caribbean -- Mysore wider east-Indian sub-continent sphere of influenced results - Second British Empire, Spanish Majorca, French Gambia, further decline of Dutch Republic - reliable scholarly reference [world military dictionary] for the military specialist - prominent adherents - Michael Clodfelter, more to follow |
Gun Laws in Vermont
editGrant, perhaps we can work on the wording together. I'd rather find language to which we can both agree than to involve myself in an edit war. James Nicol (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see what there is to work on. I used completely neutral wording that referred to "the view that..." That's pretty neutral wording, and such a conclusion has been established in the article for constitutional carry. You're the one trying to defend your edits with irrelevant political rhetoric in violation of WP:NPOV. I can't see any reason for you to object to the language I inserted other than there being a bias in play, and judging from your contributions and history, that's the only conclusion I can make. MrThunderbolt1000T (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concealed carry map
editYou can edit the legend for the concealed carry map at Template:Concealed carry permit requirements in the US. I created the template because the map appears on at least three pages, and this allows for only one page to have to be edited each time the legend needs to change. Hope this helps. Needforspeed888 (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Trolling
editPleae read wp:troll. Slatersteven (talk) 13:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please read "go back into retirement, old man." It was a single Wikipedia edit that changed a short description. :) MrThunderbolt1000T (talk) 13:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, it was a crap joke designed to wind people up. And it does not matter how many edits it was trolling is trolling. Slatersteven (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Respectfully, get bent. ❤️ MrThunderbolt1000T (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- And read wp:civility. Slatersteven (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Respectfully, get bent. ❤️ MrThunderbolt1000T (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, it was a crap joke designed to wind people up. And it does not matter how many edits it was trolling is trolling. Slatersteven (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
And given this this is now a warning, vandalize Wikipedia again and I will report you, my last word here. We are not a comedy club for your amusement we are an encyclopedia (read wp:not). Slatersteven (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- "This is now a warning... I will report you!" Dude, take a breather, go touch some grass. Your preferred candidate lost, I get it, but this is the internet and you're getting butthurt because someone poked fun at it. You're old enough to know better than to get mad at political banter. Go have a pint and chill before you have a stroke. MrThunderbolt1000T (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
don't vandalize articles please
editI get it, election its over and you wanna celebrate with some good old lighthearted mockery.
Please do that literally anywhere else but wikipedia or any other quasi-academic publication. DarmaniLink (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)