Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Fugu Alienking. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dreaded Walrus t c 15:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Carl Freer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dreaded Walrus t c 17:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear friend, I am responding to you regarding the Freer page and the ongoing smear-campaign by disgruntled former Gizmondo employees. I am not Carl Freer, although i am from Sweden and am being accused of the same... Frankly, i'm surprised that there isn't more accountability exptected from writers on this public site. The recent posting on CFreer and Fugualienking was a deliberate attempt to demonstrate this. Furthermore, its remarkable that the "authors" are completely ignoring the recent articles in Realtid.se that actually quoted the Gizmondo liquidators having completely vondicated Freer of any wrongdoing. They even referred to the (by the authors) quoted articles as inaccurate "black-pr". The amounts reflecting the development are wrong, the quotes from VA are incorrect. Most shareholders who bought shares at the single $ levels got out when the stock hit $20. The journalists that are being referenced are sensationalistic indivuals who tried to get Freer to help them write a book about Eriksson, by Eriksson... When he refused, they turned against him. Freer was also accused of lying about his trustee ship in Kings Medical research trust. I did some very basic DD and found a link that i even posted. I sincerely hope that Freer's people attack this slander-campaign more aggressively in the future. I do however notice that you are not attempting to fuel any wrong, just uphold some ordinance. So, i applaud you for that, but urge you to see through the hostile attempts to defame a private individual.
- Then source it. Removing valid citations is against Wikipedia policy, and is generally regarded as vandalism. Kirkburn (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)