Welcome!

edit
 
Hello, Mrboondocks!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

 Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.187.39.133.201 (talk) 00:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Eastern Europe and the Balkans sanctions alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit
how you assumed I am a sockpuppet ? Mrboondocks (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mrboondocks (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi I was recently blocked by a editor, who premtively assumed I am a sock, without having a proper discussion with me. in fact i added my edits with credible sources. please review this block thanks Mrboondocks (talk) 07:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

"IP checks" are usually not done to prove innocence, because they don't, but that's up to a checkuser. This request boils down to "I'm not a sock" which every sock says. You'll have to do better- agreeing to abandon editing about Eastern European issues may help. 331dot (talk) 07:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why would an admin discuss anything with a sockpuppet of a persona non grata whose modus operandi makes any such discussion a waste of time and effort? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 07:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC) I cannot directly reply directly to you, i am replying here. How come my modus operandi makes such discussion waste of time ? I infact added a credible edit in talk sections. Also such blocks discourages new users to come and edit at wiki, Every editor is new at some point. Regardless where I edited I did infact supported by arguments with credible sources. And how you assumed I am a sock pupet of anyone else ? you can check my IP or something to verify it cant you Mrboondocks (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I cannot directly reply directly to you, i am replying here. How come my modus operandi makes such discussion waste of time ? I infact added a credible edit in talk sections. Also such blocks discourages new users to come and edit at wiki, Every editor is new at some point. Regardless where I edited I did infact supported by arguments with credible sources. And how you assumed I am a sock pupet of anyone else ? you can check my IP or something to verify it cant you ?Mrboondocks (talk) 07:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC) /Reply

@Jéské Couriano Mrboondocks (talk) 07:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You deliberately produced an edit into the topic area globally banned user was involved in to make a point or to prompt someone to file SPI that would most likely show no relation to the banned user (proxy use). You are ether Icewhiz, Miacek or one of other Icewhiz's associates. Obvious sock puppet, not a new user. - GizzyCatBella🍁 08:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
you have any proof of that apart from your assumptions ? you are making an accusation you should provide proof Mrboondocks (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please direct your attention to WP:DUCK for a few minutes again. - GizzyCatBella🍁 15:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
So wiki admins relies on duck test and flag new editors as socks, never new this policy. Mrboondocks (talk) 03:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You mean like how @Philip cross account is allowed here who doesnt even take christmas holidays ? Mrboondocks (talk) 03:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 03:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply