Mrfridays
Please do not remove sourced information from wikipedia articles without first discussing it on the talk page, as you did here. If you will notice both entries you removed were sourced from reliable sources, one from the The Guardian and the other from the Associated Press. —Ocatecir Talk 07:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Neither of which belong in the section they are in, if at all. The section in question is the Episode Recap. If you want to move it to a more appropriate section, that is your perogative. If you continue to revert the page to include this, an administrator will be called. Mrfridays 07:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- I am an administrator and I have blocked you for 24 hours so that you may read Wikipedia's policy on the three revert rule. Take this time to understand that after your changes are reverted the best policy is to take the discussion to the talk pages instead of edit warring. —Ocatecir Talk 07:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- And I have alerted another Administrator about your blatent and unwarranted abuse of power. After a review of the facts involved in this situation, I have full confidence that this will be taken care of.Mrfridays 07:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Also, the "sourced information" linked is not proof that 3 different endings have been filmed. That article in referencing a popular internet rumor. Unless you have word directly from a source that quotes David Chase, or any other member of the Sopranos cast or crew, it is not official information. This is another major point of contention I have with this being listed in the article. Mrfridays 08:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Mrfridays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The Episode Recap should not contain anything outside of a synopsis of the episode's narrative. The items in question are speculative and offer interpretative statements. Furthermore, Ocatecir is not only editing content that he/she does not understand (he is merely carousing around for recent edits/reverts and is not a regular editor of Sopranos articles beyond that function), but is also abusing power, in my opinion by adding a temp ban based on a situation he shouldn't have caused in the first place. I would like this taken care of please, or investigated at the very least. This is the article in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_America_%28The_Sopranos%29 Also, to be perfectly clear, I understand that the 3RR has been violated, by both parties, and I have no problem serving the remainder of my "sentence, provided that the edits in question are addressed and corrected. It is a pretty straighforward issue, in my opinion. The lines I have removed do not belong in that section.
Decline reason:
It doesn't matter if you were right or wrong. WP:3RR restrains revert wars because they're harmful for the project, no matter of their causes. Please discuss instead of reverting. MaxSem 09:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- I guess the purpose isn't to get it right, but to feed the ego of the Wiki admins. Ok, I get it now. Thanks champ.Mrfridays 16:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.