Good Day.. I am new to this whole WIKI thing but am interested in contributing. I am wondering what exactly the problem is with the recent MFL paper submitted. I thought that it was general enough not be be classified as bias or advertising. Please advise asap.. RRempel 21:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply


I saw your note at Talk:Pigging. While I cannot answer your question, I would like to suggest you sign your comments on talk pages with ~~~~

Oh, and while I'm here:


Welcome!

Hello, Mrmcgibby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Rl 20:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Re: indigenous Australians

edit

You changed History of immigration to Australia to not use Australian Aborignes. What is your justification? (preceding unsigned comment by Mrmcgibby (talk · contribs) )

The page Australian Aborigines was recently moved to the parent article Indigenous Australians, creating a number of double-redirects, and creating many instances of inconsistent and inappropriate use of terminology. --bainer (talk) 23:56, 28 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

re: Cortosis

edit

Uh...I never said it was.--Kross | Talk 17:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Nephite NPOV

edit

I've added my take on this issue to the Talk:Nephite page. I really think you bring up a good point. However, I think perhaps we can ameliorate the situation in a different way. I'd be glad to hear more on this from you. Matatigre36 04:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply