Mrstory1

April 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tongva people because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tongva people. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tongva people was changed by Mrstory1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917929 on 2015-04-13T10:08:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

You are the destructive element, you have no right, to monitor our history, especially when it's not correct.Let us the only official Tongva have our own site, please. If not it maybe a time for a law suit. many people look at Wikipedia as something accurate, STOP PREVENTING THE TRUTH GETTING ON OUR SITE!!!!! so let us have our own, thank you

Wikipedia has certain standards: The 5 pillars. No one is exempt, no matter who they are/claim to be. You can't claim that an edit such as [1] in any way improves the article. You can take it to the talk page to discuss the matters. As for your claim "I know the truth", read WP:TRUTH. Working constructively with other editors tends to improve articles and then maybe you can get something of it in the article, whereas a ramming course will only lead to you being blocked from editing and then it is certain nothing of it will be in the article. The choice is yours. --JorisvS (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your edits have been very disruptive to date, and telling other editors that if they don't allow you to edit an article the way you want it edited "it maybe a time (sic) for a lawsuit" is contrary to policy.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)