User talk:Mrwojo/Archive 1

Archive 1

Hello there Mrwojo, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

---

Dear Mrwojo: Hello. Thank you for reading my page about the List of famous people with Cancer. Like you, I found it disturbing that some other user, without reading the page mind you, put politicians and athletes on the entertainers list. Prove that he didnt read the page wholly before editing it, is that he put athletes Lance Armstrong and Curt Flood under entertainers, when I already had them under athletes. That also made me mad cause it meant I had to work double, to erase them and, in the politician and religious people cases, relocate them to their right category.

Other than that I just wanted to say thanks for reading the article and giving your opinion. I appreciate it.

God bless you!!

Sincerely yours, AntonioMartin

EQ

Is that the correct link? I couldn't figure out why the url keeps changing! I would have emailed you but it wasn't enabled! See you in Norrath! Dominick 18:09, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

(also posted on your talk page) I'm not sure what link you're referring to. --Mrwojo 19:26, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

EverQuest Emulator Dominick 21:11, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Ah, yes. What used to be at the .com is now at the .net site. Dunno why they moved... the .com is just a placeholder now. --Mrwojo 23:35, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Redirects

Thanks for picking up those redirects I got wrong! akaDruid 15:09, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)

---

Rock the vote

A vote has been initiated on the standard template for computer and video games. As a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and Video Games, you are being solicited for input into the proposed template. Please cast your vote any make any comments at Rock the vote! Thank you! — Frecklefoot | Talk 14:23, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)

PvP

Thanks for helping me format the PvP article. It is much appreciated. --Dejitarob 20:17, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Anti PKs

Good idea on the Anti PKs article. I redirected it to Player versus player and added some information about the Anti-PK reaction to PKing. --Dejitarob 21:35, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Mrwojo,

Thanks for catching my error on the static warp bubble page. Had pasted the original text as a reference to myself and was reworking links when I saved instead of previewed. POsted revised edition at the temp page. Let me know, new to editing here, long time reader.

Jyelverton

Welcome & Edit tips

Thanks again! I'll go through the tutorial a bit more thoroughly (it's a bit sparse though).

John 18:26, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 14:40, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

History of video games

Hi, would you mind taking care of the move discussed in Talk:History of video games? --24.114.252.183 05:25, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

GCOTW

I'm giving you this message because you have been active on Gaming Collaboration of the week in the past. The collaboration had a bit of a hiatus, but it's now active again. A new article will be chosen this Sunday. It would be greatly appreciated if you visited the page to vote and/or make new nominations and worked on next week's GCOTW. Thanks. --Slowking Man 08:05, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

Spore

Hi, I added a link to the Spore (game) article you worked on. I wasn't sure if it was supposed to go under references so I placed it under external links. Anyway, I highly recommend you check out the podcast if you hadn't already. cheers Jacoplane 20:05, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Scott Miller

Good job on the Scott Miller page.. Rad Racer 19:55, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I always try to make small articles (esp. biographies) hit the major points of notability lest it be put up for deletion like Graeme Devine was. --Mrwojo 20:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, it would be lame for the creator of Kingdom of Kroz to get vfd'ed. That game was legendary. I guess people just don't have the same appreciation for extended ASCII these days.. Rad Racer 21:20, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Template CVG

Hey just to let you know I made a design change to the cvg template. Basically the change sets a width so if someone adds a ton of text it doesn't move the column width it wraps and moves down. The rest has to do with text alignment and making stuff stick out better than others (ex bolding the left column). Hopefully this will do better as a standard. Any problems let me know. I'm notifying you in case I screwed up the optional stuff. K1Bond007 23:01, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

In fact apparently the media stuff doesn't want to change. hmm :( K1Bond007 23:05, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

Nevermind. I guess it was a cache problem. After commenting the line out then uncommenting it it fixed itself. Any other problems, criticism or whatever just leave me a message. K1Bond007 23:13, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

The "(s)" thing is unfortunate. I'm not sure how to fix that (I do indeed use Firefox, makes editing multiple pages on Wikipedia easy + tons of other reasons). I notice for some reason that it doesn't always break to a new line. On X-COM: UFO Defense for instance, modes, ratings, and platforms stays on the same line. ??? Another thing about the design is do we want to continue to use purple? I guess oh well at this point. What else really needs to be done with the template? I'd like to have the entire thing done or at least a consensus before we start to use it on every page. K1Bond007 05:30, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

I think Template:Infobox CVG would be fine. It's not that wordy and CVG is a good umbrella for both computer and video games. What will be different for computer games? Just requirements? K1Bond007 23:19, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

Alright. Unless you can figure out the optional stuff then go ahead and go for it. I added optional stuff to one of my templates: Template:BondInfo and it works great, but if you have two optional lines in a row you get a nasty gap at the bottom if you don't use it. I asked the guy who made the Peru one for help on that. (ex. Never Say Never Again has the gap, but one like GoldenEye doesn't.)

Btw, I attempted to change the code a little in the template to see if I could fix the '(s)' problem, but as soon as I thought I had it fixed the width wouldn't stay set so I had to revert it. I'll try and figure this one out too. K1Bond007 23:40, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

Might be easier to seperate computer and video games. Most of the optional stuff comes from games on the computer. If it's a multiplatform game (meaning PC and (PS2/whatever) then they would use the computer template. If it's a console game (regardless of which or how many) they'd use the console template. K1Bond007 18:32, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)

Hey I think I figured out my gap problem at Template:BondInfo. All I did was add a |- after each optional (and before the first) and it compacts it. Looks kinda screwy on the page, but it works.. see:

• Dr. No
• Never Say Never Again

So far I haven't found any problems. See Template talk:BondInfo K1Bond007 02:14, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Cool I would say it's done. Since we were able to eliminate the "footer" template, I don't really see a need in seperating by video game/computer game anymore. Anything else left to do that I'm thinking of? K1Bond007 03:22, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Should we add Template:Infobox CVG extended and Template:Infobox CVG end to the templates for deletion? I'll take care of it, I just want to make sure you have no need for them anymore before I do. K1Bond007 01:27, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

As I noted the other day, the vote is pretty much done for the template. Should we just call it and make it official? I don't know if you ever saw, but I wrote/rewrote some stuff for the infobox on Template talk:Infobox CVG that we could just copy and paste on the WikiProject page. Assuming I didn't mess up, leave something out or etc. K1Bond007 19:16, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

Syntax

Please tell me, where can I find more about {{if defined call1.... ect.? --Ollinaie 09:10, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

I replied on your talk page. --Mrwojo 16:05, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Year in video gaming

For 2005 in video gaming I added pictures for the video games that were released and unveiled this year. I was wanting to know what your thoughts are on this. I'm thinking of scaling this back to just systems expected to be released or were released then going back and even forward (up to 2006) and doing the same for those pages. What do you think? Also I asked on the discussion page for 2005, but I'd like to know if you think we should continue the "Notable releases" and "Expected releases". I don't believe these are necessary and I'm afraid of all the additions or removals that may occur because 'notable' is POV. I'd much rather either list them all like Film does (2004 in film for example) or some other method that perhaps I haven't thought of. Listing them all seems to be too much for the page. Perhaps just top grossing and a link to the Category? or a List of video games released in 2005? I don't know. K1Bond007 20:51, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Interested in an L.A.-area Wiki meetup?

It appears as though L.A. has never had a Wiki meetup. Would you be interested in attending such an event? If so, checkout User:Eric Shalov/Wikimeetup.

- Eric 19:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Akihito

hi there Mrwojo, i am trying to get a discussion going to rename Akihito maybe you care to comment? thanks, looking forward... Bhinneka 29 June 2005 12:56 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It looks like you're not active anymore, but if you come back and are at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. I've marked you on this list as "inactve". Feel free to update this as well. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) July 3, 2005 18:11 (UTC)

Ken Kutaragi

I'm requesting your opnion about this dispute. Lot of POV-Pushing, the article is currently blocked. --GroundZero 21:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

dal-bati

Thanks Mrwojo. I redirected it to Baati. deeptrivia (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Indiana Jones

Hey, thanks for wikifying the titles and disambiguation, it looks great. I had, at one point, done all that and my browser crashed! Don't you hate that? —Fitch 18:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

You editted Dark Throne, do you play?

If so, could you let me know on either my talk page, by adding yourself to the Category:Wikipedians who play Dark Throne category, or both? Thanks!

Lady Aleena 12:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 03:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

I noticed you references me, Storm, in your revision of the Half-Life article! Very cool to see my interview listed as a reference, even when the website has long since been down. Nice job! StormJ 05:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

VFDed Post-object programming

I've VFDed Post-object programming, and seen you contributed to the article, so maybe are interested in the deletion discussion. --euyyn 01:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Dave Arneson badly needs citations. Can you help?

The Dave Arneson article is badly in need of citations. Back in October of 2004 you made this edit in which the article was massively fleshed out. Those additions largely stand today. I'm hoping that as the original contributor of the bulk of the article, you might be able to provide the much neede citations. Can you help? — Alan De Smet | Talk 05:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! — Alan De Smet | Talk 05:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Skywalker Ranch

Thanks for the assistance on the Skywalker Ranch article, I think you cleaned it up nicely. I'm still wondering about the Big Rock complex, although I don't have any information on it - do you know anything about that? That was my unsigned comment on the talk page, btw, back in the days prior to my creating a username. Cuffeparade 10:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Franz Josef Strauß

Might I ask you to take a look at the new discussion going on at Franz Josef Strauß? Yes, it is an ancient topic (the use of ß on en-wiki), but this is one of the most prominent articles in which this issue is of significance. Given your experience, your input would be very much appreciated. Unschool (talk) 01:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

1596 in science

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1596 in science, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com/drug_information_online.asp?title=1596_in_science. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

A false positive of a mirror, discussion started at User talk:Coren#CorenSearchBot caught a mirror (@ 1596 in science). --Mrwojo (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account, because after a review of some of your contributions it appears that we can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of reverting vandalism: and believe you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Rollback feature and Rollback school. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck.NoSeptember 05:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Red Dwarf peer review

The Red Dwarf article has just been requested for a Peer Review. As a regular editor of Red Dwarf articles I was wondering if you would like to join in on the discussions. As you may be aware, the article has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. If you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Red Dwarf --Nreive (talk) 11:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Indiana Jones

• Thanks for attention.--Olağan Şüpheli (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

GA for Dave Arneson

Hi there, I notice that you have contributed to the Dave Arneson article, and I just want to let you know that I have nominated the article for GA a few days ago. If you're interested, you may wish to place the review page on your watchlist and wait for the review to be picked up. That way you can help out when a reviewer begins to make comments. Thanks again for help in working on this article! BOZ (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Lord British article you were a major contributor too...

You have participated in the Lord British article before, and are listed as making the 5th most edits to it. Some have decided it should be eliminated entirely, with some information merged over elsewhere, but most lost forever. The same is being done for Avatar_(Ultima) and The_Companions_of_the_Avatar. In addition, one Ultima topic is up for deletion at the AFD. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Worlds_of_Ultima Please share your opinions to form consensus. Dream Focus 17:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Mark Sanford on 2012 Republican Primary Page?

I think the Sanford debate will never end, lol. I have 3 sources that are still discussing Mark Sanford in conjunction to 2012 that are less than 6 months old, but JerzeyKydd is still insisting that discussion for him has ceased for 6 months. The sources I added are less than 6 months. I agreed to take down Ensign because no one is talking him in conjunction 2012, but why are people still talking about Sanford in conjunction 2012? I was wondering if maybe you wanted to add your feedback to this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012. Thanks. --Diamond Dave (talk) 22:13, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Debate over whether or not Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford should be removed the 2012 Rep Primary Page

There seems to be yet another debate over Mark Sanford and now whether not Bobby Jindal should remain on this page. Since you are an editor on this page, I was hoping you would be interested in joining the discussion at the link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012#This_article_is_not_about_who_will_be_running.3F

Please provide your feedback! Thanks so much!

--Diamond Dave (talk) 20:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kill Stealing

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kill Stealing , has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill stealing. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Fair use rationale for File:Akalabeth map.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Akalabeth map.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 11:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

The Goonies

Good job on your recent rewrites on this article. Much improved! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. :-) —Mrwojo (talk) 22:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

1781

Where did you get your facts for The John Jameson fact mentioned here? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1781&oldid=384103311 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.97.196 (talk) 03:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I didn't add that bit about John Jameson to the 1781 article; an anonymous user added it on March 18: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1781&diff=350542961&oldid=350313551 —Mrwojo (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

NATO image

Isn't this anachronistic to show 2010 membership countries in an article about 1949? I think it would be better to find or create an image with only the original 12 nations coloured. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 04:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, we have a free image of Truman signing the North Atlantic Treaty, which is even better than a map or flag! — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 04:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quite right. Thanks! Alternatively when I have no choice other than an anachronistic image I leave a parenthetical note in the image's caption unless the issue is obvious or unimportant. —Mrwojo (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mrwojo. You have new messages at Magog the Ogre's talk page.
Message added 00:09, 18 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ravi Shankar

Hi, you removed Shankar as a Lvl 3 vital article, but he is listed at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/3/Art. How come? Hekerui (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I'll ask the question on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles. Hekerui (talk) 19:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:VA count

Good catches; only links count. I've fixed the counts in the sections, but I've added a few articles, too, so now the count is 987 as best I can tell. HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 21:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Indiana Jones

I suggest you watch through the Young Indiana Jones Chronicles episode "British East Africa, September 1909" before you finalise the origin of his ophidiophobia. I don't where you got this false quote "It's only a snake", but he says nothing of the sort. Please check the facts. Deltasim (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Replied at Talk:Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade#Indy's fear of snakes. —Mrwojo (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Greenberg

The article Andrew Greenberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of personal notability. lists only that he worked on some video games.. not the he himself is notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tracer9999 (talk) 18:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Indiana Jones map

I made that map a long time ago, so I'm not very sure where I got the information from. If you'd like to edit it to reflect what you pointed out, I have no problem with it. I haven't seen Raiders in a while, so I trust your judgement.

Jacrio (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Template talk:Pulitzer Prize for History

Since you have edited this template in the past, I am requesting your feedback at Template talk:PulitzerPrize History.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

I have a second issue in need of feedback at Template talk:PulitzerPrize History#Color.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Mrwojo/Archive 1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Elisha P. Ferry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: "Fix ISBN" edits doing more than that?

I accidentally edited old versions of the pages. Thank you very much for fixing List of common misconceptions and letting me know about the others (which I have now fixed). Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

WP:VG Interview

This hasn't hit the mainstream yet, but today is an important day for WP:VG. We've reached our 10 year anniversary! The WP:VG Newsletter crew are interested in running a feature this quarter on the early days of WP:VG and because you are one of the earliest contributors to the WikiProject, we need your help. In the last 10 years a lot has changed and we'd love to hear your perspective on it. One of the biggest changes may be your level of participation in the WikiProject or even in Wikipedia generally. This is why I'm contacting you almost 2 months before the newsletter is due to come out (it's due on April 2). I'm hoping that you'll have time somewhere between now and then to answer a few general questions reflecting on WP:VG and Wikipedia in general. Please contact me here if you would be willing to answer a few questions for our anniversary article. If you can participate, please mark this beside your name on the list, and if you can't participate please also mark this on the list by deleting your name or overstriking it. I hope this will be a fun and interesting quarter for the WP:VG Newsletter! Thanks in advance. -Thibbs (talk) 12:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

• PS - If you'd prefer, I could also contact you by email. Let me know if that would be more convenient for you. -Thibbs (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UnrealEd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UnrealEd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Last call for interview

This is the final call for participation in the WikiProject Video games Newsletter's 10th anniversary interview. As the project's very first member we would love to hear your views on the project, however the newsletter is due for release on April 2, so there is very little time. Again, the interview questions can be found here, and you can either respond here, at my talk page, at the interview itself, or by emailing me. You can answer as many or as few questions as you wish. I hope we get a chance to hear from you! -Thibbs (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

References

Hi, I've seen the good work you've done on suppressed correlative and other pages, and I was wondering if you were interested in helping me finding good sources for other articles, like Denying the correlative, Subverted support, Package-deal fallacy and other fallacy-related subjects. Thanks in advance - Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Archive 1