Mtierney01
Mtierney01, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Mtierney01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hey! This is my first time back on here since last Thursday. I like the "contact high" idea. I think we would be able to run with it well and i am sure there is a lot of information we can find on here to help. I will look around a little more though, and I agree about solidifying an idea, that way we can get a little bit of a jump on the game. see you at 2:30!! BMcInerney8792 (talk) 16:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Topic choice assignment
editRelationship anarchy is not a good choice - There is almost no scholarly work on this topic, so there won't be much to add to this page. I also don't think that contact high will work well either, for lack of clear research and differentiation from other topics. I also think that hysterical contagion may be too specific. It is very similar to other related topics on Wikipedia and in just a quick Internet search I am seeing mostly references to one particular case. I don't think there is enough here for a really comprehensive Wikipedia treatment. I think the group attribution error article shows promise though.
When you refer to other Wiki articles, you should use the mark-up to link to them directly. For example social facilitation. Click the edit source on this page to see the mark-up for the link.Gseidman (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Article feedback assignment
editGreat comment on the social psychology talk page! You should consider following up to the response.Gseidman (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Adding reference assignment
editFantastic job! Not only were your references appropriate, but you also linked to other Wiki articles and really added important and relevant content.Gseidman (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)