Muchclag

CUVThis user is dedicated to
cleaning up vandalism.

Welcome

Hello, Muchclag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I notice you've taken a quick liking to fighting vandalism. Thanks a lot for your help; we can always use more vandal fighters! You might be interested in advice on cleaning up vandalism and the recent changes patrol. You can report serial vandals at administrator intervention against vandalism, and request page protections at requests for page protection.

Again, welcome!  --Slowking Man 14:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Hailsham

I have substantially re-written the current article on Hailsham . Could someone take a look and tell me what you think? Muchclag 13:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

In addition to this, I wish to write an article on Hailsham Railway Station, which closed in 1968. Is there a definitive 'look' which closed station articles should have about them? (Ie Route Map, etc? - Cheers. Muchclag 20:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I'll be glad to. Give me a few minutes JodyB _talk 20:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Generally, your material looks good. The biggest problem I see is with your references. If you are going to use inline notes (which I'm glad to see you doing) you might use the citation templates, {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} . These will include all the information automatically and place them in your references section. It takes a bit to get used to them and if you have any problems, let me know. As for the closed station, I'm not sure I can give you a perfect answer. Look around at other similar articles or find the Wikiproject for railroads. I'm sure you could find a chap there to help. Keep it up! JodyB _talk 20:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that, it's much appreciated :) Muchclag 20:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject UK Railways

Hi. Love the username! Have you come across Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways yet? There are plenty of discussions there about closed stations, and more, and you'll find plenty help.

Regarding Hailsham railway station... You may be interested in List of closed railway stations in Britain: H-J and List of closed railway lines in Great Britain. May I strongly recommend that you probably don't need to create an article for that station, unless there was an awful lot that happened there. I would suggest that creation of an article about the line in question (the Cuckoo Line? I couldn't locate it), with subsections for each station, is the most appropriate way to go. (If the line left the Hastings Line just south of Tunbridge Wells, then the Hastings Line route map includes a likely-looking unmarked junction which would benefit from a description!) Redirects may then be created for each closed station, which avoids repeating all the information about the closed railway line on every page.

Incidentally, when you refer to railway stations in articles it is worth considering whether you want to link to the placename article or the railway station article. Since the station should provide a link to the place, it may be a quicker solution for navigation if the station article is the initial link.

EdJogg 19:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that! - the Cuckoo Line is indeed correct, and I'll look into producing an article. As you guessed, the line did leave the Hastings line at Grove Junction. Muchclag 19:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Could you adjust the route map at Hastings Line in due course please? EdJogg 21:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Muchclag 21:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Dreadful

I nominated an article that you created, Dreadful, for deletion. If you think that the article is salvageable, or that I'm mistaken, please comment on its deletion page. Please see the Guide to deletion if you have any questions about Wikipedia's deletion process. -- Tikiwont 09:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hate to say 'I told you so', but see the comments on the Dreadful talk page...

If you can find adequate external reliable sources, then you may stand a chance of this article being saved. If not, I suspect its days are numbered...

Let me know if I can help in any way, but bear in mind that as the article stands I cannot honestly oppose the AfD suggestion.

EdJogg 10:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

See comments on AfD page. I can't honestly see why an article could be 'too' detailed myself, but I'm fairly new here, very new to creating articles, and I'm prepared to go with consensus :) Muchclag 11:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I've read them, and I think that 99.9% of Wikipedians won't have a clue what you're talking about when you mention 'Brush rather than Maybach thrash', but since I'm talking to you rather than about the article, I thought I'd respond here.

Now, the fundamental problem with 'Dreadful' as an article is that it is effectively a dictionary definition, albeit an expanded one, about an adjective. That is why there was the earlier suggestion to 'Transwiki' (ie move) it to Wiktionary. If you can provide appropriate written examples of its usage then you might stand a chance adding it there (I successfully saved 'ferroequinology' there earlier this year! - with the help of some others...).

As I implied earlier, I cannot really find any justification for keeping Dreadfull at WP. However, I think there is a definite place for jargon definitions at Train Spotting World, so I've copied the content over there (see link). Feel free to add your other terms (such as 'clag') over there, where the rules are rather more relaxed (although it is rather quiet at present!!) I have also taken the liberty of copying the picture across.

EdJogg 12:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Class 47 page

Hi - thanks for adding the picture of 47714 to the article. Only thing is, that particular photo doesn't actually show the Anglia Railways livery very well. Have you got a more side-on view of the loco that would be better? (I haven't - as you might have noticed from the photos I've added, I pretty much gave up bashing in 1989!). ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 10:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I've got a fairly side on picture, which I've uploaded to Imageshack. If you would like to see it in the article, let me know on here and I'll add it :)

Picture for review; http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/5649/dscn0579dr5.jpg

Muchclag 18:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that one's much better - do you want to insert that one instead? Cheers, ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 21:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Now done :) Muchclag 22:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Hailsham

{{helpme}}

Could someone please advise what would need to be done on article Hailsham to get it up to GA status?

Cheers.Muchclag (talk) 19:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Mhh, I'd say to start with it needs a lot of references adding which are reliable (try Google, some of their search results on subjects are reliable) and the sections need some cleanup and copyediting, for example the merging of one sentence 'paragraphs' in to the larger paragraphs. Cheers, Qst 20:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Greetings. I was looking for a project to work on after getting Eastbourne to GA status. I lived in Hailsham for a couple of years too, so lets do it! You may have noticed I have had a little edit already. The main problem I found was the title in the citations, these need to match the actual title of the work. I do not know who created them originally, but it is something that needs checking. Have you seen Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements? This gives a list of all the headings the article will need. Its a good starting point. MortimerCat (talk) 19:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for your input - I like the Eastbourne article a lot, so it will be good to do some work on together. Muchclag (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sussex county flag.JPG

Image:Sussex county flag.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Leon Legge

Hey, no worries, you did a really decent job with the article, keep it up. --Jimbo^[online] 13:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:37510 Stowmarket Marsh Lane.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Muchclag. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hailsham Town FC Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hailsham Town FC Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Muchclag. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Muchclag. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, no I wasn't aware - have now cited :) Muchclag (talk) 19:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Tweedie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abyssinia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

2019-20 Southern Combination League

Hi there, I've been using an excel spreadsheet, adding up the totals for each team and using what the formula excel comes out for averages. What method should I be using? EddersGTI (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thanks - I would just add the number of games played in total, and divide that number by the total attendance to produce an average. According to https://www.nonleaguematters.co.uk/divisions/38/ the highest attendance for a Division One game this season is 168, so the average currently showing on the article of 1,039 is clearly incorrect. Many Thanks! Muchclag (talk) 21:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1888–89 British Home Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Yates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Tommy Morren‎

Your claim that he was a 'one-club man' was a) unsupported and b) incorrect. I have updated the article. GiantSnowman 19:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Nothing wrong with NFT as a source per se, I use it lots myself - it can just be incomplete for older players. GiantSnowman 19:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1902–03 British Home Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sharp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Paywall articles as sources

Reading the Daily Telegraph this morning, noticed an obituary for Henry Haller . The online version is behind a paywall - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2020/11/12/henry-haller-unflappable-white-house-chef-cooked-five-presidents/ and the only other source I could find is also behind a paywall (I think!) https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/henry-haller-wie-ein-schweizer-zum-legendaeren-chefkoch-des-weissen-hauses-wurde-ld.1586009?reduced=true . Where do we stand with adding these as citations? As you can see I usually edit long dead people, so wasn't sure if I/we could use these as the only (so far) sources for someone recently deceased?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muchclag (talk • contribs) 13:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Paywalled sources are just fine (as long as they're reliable of course), see Wikipedia:Verifiability#Access to sources. 78.28.55.91 (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, much appreciated. Muchclag (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Richard Rhodes Bristow is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Leon Legge

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Leon Legge, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)