Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GiantSnowman18:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Also, your other changes is bad, for example [1]. First discuss, wait for consensus (please read Wikipedia:Consensus), later controversial changes. Your behavior is breaking a number of rules of Wikipedia, also including Wikipedia:BATTLEGROUND. Please stop. You do not enter controversial changes to Wikipedia (without discuss and consensus), always such changes will be reverted by other users and you will be blocked for longer - with an expiry time of indefinite (because now, this account serves as a disruptive editing). So you lose time. Again: first - discuss, later changes. Subtropical-man talk (en-2)18:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used both for pages regarding the Balkans and to pages regarding Eastern Europe, topics which you have edited. The Committee's decisions are here and here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. De728631 (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at War in Donbass. Jeppiz (talk) 19:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Also, your other changes is bad, for example [1]. First discuss, wait for consensus (please read Wikipedia:Consensus), later controversial changes. Your behavior is breaking a number of rules of Wikipedia, also including Wikipedia:BATTLEGROUND. Please stop. You do not enter controversial changes to Wikipedia (without discuss and consensus), always such changes will be reverted by other users and you will be blocked for longer - with an expiry time of indefinite (because now, this account serves as a disruptive editing). So you lose time. Again: first - discuss, later changes. Subtropical-man talk
You broke next rule of Wikipedia - Wikipedia:No personal attacks, two times: [2][3]. Understand one thing, what you think, others may have a different opinion than you. If you want to change controversial things in Wikipedia, ok - but debate and consensus is necessary. Subtropical-man talk
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subtropical-man (talk • contribs) 19:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Muffi reported by User:Bobrayner (Result: ). Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC