You not Wikipedia official editor so I have to close your IP address

edit

You not Wikipedia official editor so I have to close your IP address Austin, Texas 188.34.56.79.00 2600:1700:1ADC:490:A5D6:6E14:B572:24E4 (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am correcting some articles and I hope that it will bring the user more benefit than harm I like to edit articles and correct and for this I love Wikipedia and I hope I will be able to edit articles further Muhammad boboev (talk) 10:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

To be clear (if it wasn't obvious), there's no such thing as a "Wikipedia official editor," and the message this user left appears to be harmless nonsense. You're entirely fine to continue editing Wikipedia. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 14:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan clashes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Wikipedia has a policy of avoiding reverting the same page more than three times in a 24 hour period WP:3RR. Please be cautious of engaging in edit warring and bring issues to the article's talk page. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 14:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


  Hi Muhammad boboev! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2022 Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan clashes several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2022 Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan clashes, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. I have started a conversation at Talk:2022 Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan clashes#Edit Warring over Casualties. Please discuss the changes you want to see there, instead of continuing to participate in back and forth reverts. Note that this message is not a judgement on which version of the article is correct, just a request that consensus be built at the talk page before the article is reverted. Thanks!. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 19:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Muhammad_boboev reported by User:Dylnuge (Result: ). Thank you. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 14:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing 2022 Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan clashes for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

During your block, I suggest you discuss the changes you want to make on the talk page. Further edit-warring after this block expires will result in a more extensive block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Muhammad_boboev reported by User:Dylnuge (Result: ). Thank you. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 04:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muhammad boboev. It has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 13:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply