May 2015

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock-puppetry using the account Zoheb.haider for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 18:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Munchkin1230 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here: Hi Favonian, I used another account, zoheb.haider to make the minor revision since I forgot the password on this one. In all my attempts to contribute thus far, I have maintained the integrity of rules practiced by Wikipedia and have been updating my revisions with appropriate citations, respecting other users' feedback. Now, after trying for about 7 times, I finally logged in using the old account just to get through to you and explain the situation. I am still not sure why this situation has been treated as such that I am completely blocked out of Wiki? I am a frequent blogger and I am just looking to have a good start on Wikipedia. Please advice.

Decline reason:

Treated as such because of your using more than one account. As you have now remembered the password on this account I suggest that you write it down, in a secure place, so as not to forget it again. And do not use your other account. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Munchkin1230 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, I will do that for sure. Can I have access invoked on this account please? Whatever happened was purely coincidental and unintentional from my end and I did not mean to cause any conflicts. I am sorry if it came out that way. It's a weekend and I would really like to explore and contribute here. Thanks!

Decline reason:

You shouldn't have used the alternative account to continue an edit war. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.