Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ozzy osbourne down to earth front cover.jpg

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Ozzy osbourne down to earth front cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Perfect manners

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Perfect manners, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CultureDrone (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

 
Hello, Munifico. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Kelly Marks

edit
 

The article Kelly Marks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable. Cannot find multiple independent non-trivial sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dana boomer (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

01:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

January 2023

edit

  An article you recently created, Gou Tanabe, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 21:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
I think the article, though still a stub, now meets the minimum requirements to be publicly visible. I couldn't find any such button "Submit your draft for review!" anywhere on the page... so I wonder if you could take a look at it. Thanks in advance. Munifico (talk) 01:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Jinhao moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Jinhao, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for the heads-up.
I just added missing info, logo, templates, notes and references. I submitted the draft to review, as requested.
I'm looking forward to your comment/publication. Munifico (talk) 19:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jinhao (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Munifico! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply