January 2021

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sergio Rodríguez (academician), from its old location at User:Munnius. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alcañices and translating articles

edit

Hi Munnius, and thank you for your contributions at Alcañices, which you have recently significantly expanded. I noticed that you translated content from the Spanish version of the article, which is absolutely fine, but I'd like to point to two things: Firstly, when translating from another Wikimedia project (such as an other-language version of Wikipedia), you have to give attribution to the source material; see here for how and why. Secondly, please also cite the sources that are used in the Spanish version, for purposes of verifiability. I noticed that several parts of the Spanish Alcañices article cite sources that you omitted in the English translation. I hope this helps, and if you have any questions or need help, please let me know! Lennart97 (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomás Pellicer (January 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Munnius! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomás Pellicer has been accepted

edit
 
Tomás Pellicer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergio Rodríguez (academician) (January 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 18:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Carlo Gastini moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Carlo Gastini, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, the only in-depth sourcing is from primary sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergio Rodríguez (academician) (June 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Doric Loon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Doric Loon (talk) 19:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Carlo Gastini

edit

  Hello, Munnius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carlo Gastini, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sergio Rodríguez (academician)

edit

  Hello, Munnius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sergio Rodríguez (academician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlo Gastini (December 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sergio Rodríguez (academician) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sergio Rodríguez (academician). Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sergio Rodríguez (academician)

edit
 

Hello, Munnius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sergio Rodríguez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply