Music2247

December 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Moxy 🍁 13:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Judas Priest, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 16:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Liam Gallagher. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Still edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Led Zeppelin. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Queen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SolarFlash (talk) 20:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

More edit warring happening

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Liam Gallagher; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SolarFlash (talk) 20:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits and edit warring

Hi. You're new to WP, and I know it can be frustrating when you don't understand some of the WP's rules. First, anybody can edit WP, so welcome. Second, however, when you are reverted, rather than simply re-revert, you should open up a discussion on the article's talk page. There, other editors may or may not chime in, but if possible a consensus should be reached before you attempt to make the changes. I see that it now looks like you've opened up discussions, so please see how they play out before attempting to make those changes again. That could take several days, or perhaps even a week or two. Be patient. Also, be aware of overlinking. One of your edits looked fine, except for the overlinking for London. Another editor has made that correction, rather than reverting your entire edit. Your comments on the talk pages where you state, "I don't know why that's considered "disruptive editing"", highlight why talk page discussions are necessary. Hopefully by the end of the discussion you will have a better understanding of why what you are doing isn't acceptable, and you'll start a long career of constructive editing here on WP. And don't be afraid to ask questions, that's how we all learned. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 19:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

You have multiple editors reaching out to you and posting words of caution and warning on your talk page. Yet as far as I can tell you have not responded to any of them. This is a collaborative project and that will not do. Please slow down and engage with your fellow editors. If this needs to be addressed again you may find yourself blocked until you decide to start talking. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism while blocked

@NJA: Please remove TPA - FlightTime (open channel) 17:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I changed the block settings, N.J.A. | talk 17:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Ad Orientem (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)