March 2007

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Calculate Age, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ST47Talk 12:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Calculate Age, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. OverlordQ 12:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the V. R. Coss House page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jacklau96 07:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nephrology

edit

Hi Muskdial, {{welcome}} to Wikipedia and good on joining the Nephrology WikiProject. I hope you don't mind I've removed the external links that you added to a few articles. I didn't think they met our guidelines for external links.

WP:CLINMED is the general hub for medical contributors, and you're free to join us there too. We collaborate on medical articles and occasionally have to face some controversy. Let me know if you need a hand - I'm an administrator (since 2004). JFW | T@lk 15:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have responded to your comments left on the WikiProject Nephrology talkpage. JFW | T@lk 22:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: You may have missed something

edit

I'm not sure I understand your comment. I don't think I've had any interaction with the Raul Julia-Levy article. Can you clarify what you mean?--Kubigula (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ahh - you're right. Thanks for pointing that out.--Kubigula (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your kind words on my talk page - I appreciate it. The external links on the Raul Julia-Levy article are probably OK - the bio article is the only page where a link to a person's personal website can be appropriate. Let me know if you see anything else or you need assistance - I'll try to respond a bit quicker next time.--Kubigula (talk) 04:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mr. Tambourine Man contribution

edit

Thank you for your contribution to the "Mr. Tambourine Man" article - it's a notable and worthwhile fact. I think perhaps you weren't aware, but I had actually relocated it to the "Other covers and references" section, since it's not strictly about the song's composition or recording - it details an incident nearly two years after the song was written and recorded. It seems to me that it's much more relevant to the "Other covers and references" section than to the "Composition and recording" section. As such. perhaps you could undo your last edit and thus, return the paragraph to it's more appropriate place. By the way, you also don't need to sign your edits with your user name. Many thanks.

PS. - you don't need to put a duplicate of your contribution on the talk page - this isn't what talk pages are for. Please take a look at WP:TPG for the proper usage of talk pages.--Kohoutek1138 (talk) 22:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to V. R. Coss House, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 10:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Coss3.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Coss3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Coss.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Coss.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Calculate Age.3.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Calculate Age.3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply