Mussme

Welcome!

Hello, Mussme!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Jip Orlando (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Question

Hi. I reverted your external link additions to many articles. The links appear to be translations with commentary and/or transcriptions. Are these substantially different than the Project Gutenberg ones? The only major difference I see is that there is a tag on the top of the externally-linked pages that there may be some student commentary on the books. As such, this appears to be linkspamming and inappropriate for external links. Jip Orlando (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm Jip Orlando. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Please engage. If you continue your behavior without explanation and discussion, I will escalate to a noticeboard. Thank you. Jip Orlando (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

I agree with Jip; See WP:LINKSTOAVOID (line item #2). The highlight and comments from school staff and students is "unverifiable research" and doesn't merit linking from an encyclopedia. See also WP:NOTHERE.... you're spamming that site to articles, not working on building encyclopedic content. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 15:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jip Orlando (talk) 14:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Oz\^InterAct 15:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

• I'm gonna jump in here and try to soften this a bit. I can see why you might think the linked material might be appropriate, but really, we can't be endorsing student-generated content, even if it's faculty-supervised. EEng 16:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC)