Mwiggs

Enfieldian - Enfield beast

Hello Mwiggs. I appreciate your contributions to the Enfield (1893) F.C. article on Wikipedia. In the section titled Badge, you changed 'Enfield beast' to 'Enfieldian'. I researched this a bit, and I could only find the word 'Enfieldian' being used as someone from Enfield or as an adjective meaning to do with Enfield. So I have reversed this edit, but if you have references for the heraldic creature of Enfield being called an Enfieldian, please reinstate your edit, but please also either add a redirection page from Enfieldian to Enfield beast, or rename the article Enfield beast to Enfieldian. If you would like any help doing this, please write on my User talk page. Thank you. Coyets (talk) 13:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enfield 1893 F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

October 2015

Your recent editing history at Enfield 1893 F.C. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Please note this edit summary: "This looks like an unattributed copy-paste *do not restore* - admin action." If you restore again without discussing you may be blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)